A comprehensive performance evaluation of objective quality metrics for contrast enhancement techniques

M. A. Qureshi, Azeddine Beghdadi, Bilel Sdiri, Mohamed Deriche, F. A. Cheikh
{"title":"A comprehensive performance evaluation of objective quality metrics for contrast enhancement techniques","authors":"M. A. Qureshi, Azeddine Beghdadi, Bilel Sdiri, Mohamed Deriche, F. A. Cheikh","doi":"10.1109/EUVIP.2016.7764589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we present a comprehensive analysis and comparison of state-of-the-art Contrast Enhancement (CE) evaluation metrics. In this work, we developed a new database consisting of 182 images. The subjective experiments were performed to obtain a preference rating from different observers for the enhanced images using six CE methods selected from different representative categories. The quality of the enhanced images is measured with most commonly used CE evaluation metrics. We provide the ranking of images based on perceptual preference as well as objective quality metrics scores. We show that some of the metrics used for the enhancement evaluation are not consistent with the human subjective scores. This new database, named as Contrast Enhancement Evaluation Database (CEED2016), is made publicly available to the research community at http://wwwl2ti.univ-paris13.fr/site/index.php/en/CEED2016/ and is expected to be a contribution to the area of Image Quality Assessment (IQA) and particularly for image quality enhancement evaluation.","PeriodicalId":136980,"journal":{"name":"2016 6th European Workshop on Visual Information Processing (EUVIP)","volume":"190 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 6th European Workshop on Visual Information Processing (EUVIP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EUVIP.2016.7764589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

In this paper, we present a comprehensive analysis and comparison of state-of-the-art Contrast Enhancement (CE) evaluation metrics. In this work, we developed a new database consisting of 182 images. The subjective experiments were performed to obtain a preference rating from different observers for the enhanced images using six CE methods selected from different representative categories. The quality of the enhanced images is measured with most commonly used CE evaluation metrics. We provide the ranking of images based on perceptual preference as well as objective quality metrics scores. We show that some of the metrics used for the enhancement evaluation are not consistent with the human subjective scores. This new database, named as Contrast Enhancement Evaluation Database (CEED2016), is made publicly available to the research community at http://wwwl2ti.univ-paris13.fr/site/index.php/en/CEED2016/ and is expected to be a contribution to the area of Image Quality Assessment (IQA) and particularly for image quality enhancement evaluation.
对比增强技术客观质量指标的综合性能评价
在本文中,我们提出了一个全面的分析和比较最先进的对比度增强(CE)评估指标。在这项工作中,我们开发了一个由182张图像组成的新数据库。通过主观实验,从不同的代表性类别中选择六种CE方法,获得不同观察者对增强图像的偏好等级。增强图像的质量是用最常用的CE评价指标来衡量的。我们提供了基于感知偏好和客观质量指标得分的图像排名。我们表明,用于增强评估的一些指标与人类的主观得分不一致。这个新的数据库,被命名为对比度增强评估数据库(CEED2016),在http://wwwl2ti.univ-paris13.fr/site/index.php/en/CEED2016/上公开提供给研究界,预计将对图像质量评估(IQA)领域做出贡献,特别是图像质量增强评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信