A review of literature on connections between engineering education and cognitive development in K-12 students

Joshua Alexéi García Sheridan
{"title":"A review of literature on connections between engineering education and cognitive development in K-12 students","authors":"Joshua Alexéi García Sheridan","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2018.8658684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reviews the current body of literature comprising studies connecting engineering education in K-12 with elements of cognitive development. The process of change towards engineering being taught in K-12 classrooms involves the establishment of developmentally appropriate standards that inform curriculum. Established standards such as those of the NGSS and ITEEA STLs provide a nationally applicable framework for curricula throughout the United States. Nevertheless, it is important to critically consider what the foundations of such standards are in terms of empirical research. The development of rigorous standards for K-12 engineering education is a continuous process. Without a foundation of understanding for how children think about and learn engineering, standards will not optimally inform curricula how to teach engineering. So, do these foundations exist? The National Research Council (NRC) delivered a recommendation in 2010 to engage in the development of better understanding for how students learn engineering concepts in K-12. The intention of this recommendation was to facilitate effective and developmentally appropriate integration of engineering in K-12. The context of discussion in this recommendation was determining the viability and necessity of standards for engineering education in K-12. At the time, the committee determined fundamental questions were yet to be answered that would properly inform developmentally appropriate standards. This indicates that progress towards better understanding of student cognition had not occurred quickly. It is worth exploring to what extent observations such as these are currently accurate. Such shortcomings, if they exist, may critically inform initiatives within the educational research community. This systematic literature review will seek to uncover to what level fundamental research across several major publications in the past eight years focuses on critically describing the facets of child cognition and cognitive development in relation to the context of engineering in education. The scope of the review will include empirical studies detailing the measurement of perceptions pertaining to engineering, critical assessment of knowledge transfer for and conceptual understanding of engineering content, use of language and communication by students in engineering activities, and study of systems of thinking and habits of mind affecting student performance in engineering activities.","PeriodicalId":354904,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2018.8658684","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper reviews the current body of literature comprising studies connecting engineering education in K-12 with elements of cognitive development. The process of change towards engineering being taught in K-12 classrooms involves the establishment of developmentally appropriate standards that inform curriculum. Established standards such as those of the NGSS and ITEEA STLs provide a nationally applicable framework for curricula throughout the United States. Nevertheless, it is important to critically consider what the foundations of such standards are in terms of empirical research. The development of rigorous standards for K-12 engineering education is a continuous process. Without a foundation of understanding for how children think about and learn engineering, standards will not optimally inform curricula how to teach engineering. So, do these foundations exist? The National Research Council (NRC) delivered a recommendation in 2010 to engage in the development of better understanding for how students learn engineering concepts in K-12. The intention of this recommendation was to facilitate effective and developmentally appropriate integration of engineering in K-12. The context of discussion in this recommendation was determining the viability and necessity of standards for engineering education in K-12. At the time, the committee determined fundamental questions were yet to be answered that would properly inform developmentally appropriate standards. This indicates that progress towards better understanding of student cognition had not occurred quickly. It is worth exploring to what extent observations such as these are currently accurate. Such shortcomings, if they exist, may critically inform initiatives within the educational research community. This systematic literature review will seek to uncover to what level fundamental research across several major publications in the past eight years focuses on critically describing the facets of child cognition and cognitive development in relation to the context of engineering in education. The scope of the review will include empirical studies detailing the measurement of perceptions pertaining to engineering, critical assessment of knowledge transfer for and conceptual understanding of engineering content, use of language and communication by students in engineering activities, and study of systems of thinking and habits of mind affecting student performance in engineering activities.
工程教育与K-12学生认知发展关系的文献综述
本文回顾了目前的文献,包括将K-12工程教育与认知发展要素联系起来的研究。在K-12课程中,向工程学转变的过程包括建立与发展相适应的标准,为课程提供信息。诸如NGSS和ITEEA stl的既定标准为整个美国的课程提供了全国适用的框架。然而,重要的是要批判性地考虑这些标准在实证研究方面的基础是什么。制定严格的K-12工程教育标准是一个持续的过程。如果没有对儿童如何思考和学习工程的理解基础,标准将无法最佳地告知课程如何教授工程。那么,这些基金会存在吗?美国国家研究委员会(NRC)在2010年提出了一项建议,旨在更好地理解学生如何在K-12阶段学习工程概念。这项建议的目的是促进K-12课程中工程学的有效和发展相适应的整合。本建议讨论的背景是确定K-12工程教育标准的可行性和必要性。当时,委员会确定了一些基本问题尚未得到回答,这些问题将适当地为发展适当的标准提供信息。这表明,在更好地理解学生认知方面的进展并没有很快发生。值得探讨的是,诸如此类的观察目前在多大程度上是准确的。如果存在这样的缺点,可能会对教育研究界的举措产生重要影响。这篇系统的文献综述将试图揭示在过去八年中,几个主要出版物的基础研究在何种程度上专注于批判性地描述与教育工程背景相关的儿童认知和认知发展的各个方面。审查的范围将包括实证研究,详细说明与工程有关的感知测量,对工程内容的知识转移和概念理解的批判性评估,学生在工程活动中使用的语言和交流,以及影响学生在工程活动中表现的思维系统和思维习惯的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信