Reliability analysis of distribution networks

O. Shavuka, K. Awodele, S. Chowdhury, S. Chowdhury
{"title":"Reliability analysis of distribution networks","authors":"O. Shavuka, K. Awodele, S. Chowdhury, S. Chowdhury","doi":"10.1109/POWERCON.2010.5666066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Historical assessment and predictive methods are normally used to evaluate the reliability of a distribution network. Most utilities focus more on historical assessment rather than predictive methods. Predictive methods are categorised into analytical and simulation methods. The difference between these methods is the way in which the system reliability indices are evaluated. In this paper, the authors apply both analytical and simulation methods to calculate the reliability indices such as System Average Interruption Frequency Index (SAIFI) and System Average Interruption Duration Index (SAIDI) for two distribution systems. The Test systems are bus six of the Roy Billinton Test System and a real distribution network in Western Cape, South Africa. Results from these two approaches and some changes in operating philosophy are presented and compared in the paper. Probability distribution of SAIFI and SAIDI which give information about the variability of the indices and are therefore useful for decision making were obtained.","PeriodicalId":169553,"journal":{"name":"2010 International Conference on Power System Technology","volume":"2018 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 International Conference on Power System Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/POWERCON.2010.5666066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Historical assessment and predictive methods are normally used to evaluate the reliability of a distribution network. Most utilities focus more on historical assessment rather than predictive methods. Predictive methods are categorised into analytical and simulation methods. The difference between these methods is the way in which the system reliability indices are evaluated. In this paper, the authors apply both analytical and simulation methods to calculate the reliability indices such as System Average Interruption Frequency Index (SAIFI) and System Average Interruption Duration Index (SAIDI) for two distribution systems. The Test systems are bus six of the Roy Billinton Test System and a real distribution network in Western Cape, South Africa. Results from these two approaches and some changes in operating philosophy are presented and compared in the paper. Probability distribution of SAIFI and SAIDI which give information about the variability of the indices and are therefore useful for decision making were obtained.
配电网可靠性分析
配电网可靠性评估通常采用历史评估和预测方法。大多数实用程序更多地关注历史评估,而不是预测方法。预测方法分为分析方法和模拟方法。这些方法的不同之处在于评估系统可靠性指标的方法。本文采用分析和仿真相结合的方法,计算了两个配电系统的平均中断频率指数(SAIFI)和平均中断持续时间指数(SAIDI)。这些测试系统是罗伊·比林顿测试系统的6台总线,是南非西开普省的一个真正的分销网络。本文对这两种方法所取得的成果和经营理念的一些变化进行了介绍和比较。得到了SAIFI和SAIDI的概率分布,给出了指标变异性的信息,为决策提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信