3D Mad Dog Pressure and Stress Prediction Coupling Seismic Velocities, Pressure, and Stress Measurements

M. Nikolinakou, Xiaonan Wang Dosser, P. Flemings, M. Johri
{"title":"3D Mad Dog Pressure and Stress Prediction Coupling Seismic Velocities, Pressure, and Stress Measurements","authors":"M. Nikolinakou, Xiaonan Wang Dosser, P. Flemings, M. Johri","doi":"10.4043/32555-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n We predict pressure and stress in the 3D Mad Dog field using the Full Effective Stress (FES) pressure-prediction workflow. The FES workflow incorporates the full stress tensor (e.g., lateral stress and deviatoric stresses) into pressure prediction: it uses a geomechanical model to predict mean total and shear stresses in the 3D field and a relationship between velocity and equivalent effective stress (instead of vertical effective stress) to account for both mean- and shear-induced pore pressure generation. In complex geologic settings, such as salt basins or thrust belts, compaction depends on non-vertical and differential stresses; in such settings, the FES method offers a significant improvement over the traditional approach, that is based on the vertical effective stress. We focus our study on the anticline below the Mad Dog salt at the original platform area. We quantify the mean and shear-induced overpressures and show that shear-induced pressures account for 80% of the total overpressure in front of the salt. We also show that shear-induced pressures are the source of more than 1.5ppg overpressure in the anticline below salt, where the mean-stress approach alone predicts underpressures (less than hydrostatic). Higher pressures and the decrease in lateral stress in the anticline area lead to a 1ppg drilling window (defined in this paper as the difference between the pore pressure and minimum principal stress at any given depth). This drilling window is shifted to higher overpressures by 0.4ppg compared to the VES prediction. We find that the stress ratio in the mudrocks decreases to ~55% of its uniaxial value. Furthermore, we show that the velocity-informed geomechanical model is able to predict the pore pressure regression observed at Mad Dog and the regional hydraulic connectivity in the area. The three-dimansional (3D) geomechanical model is built in Horizon (Elfen). The known pressure regression in the sands is modeled; mudrock pore pressures are initialized using the VES estimate. Modified Cam Clay is used to quantify mean- and shear-induced compaction. Overall, we demonstrate that incorporating the full stress tensor is important for pressure and stress prediction at Mad Dog, and that the FES method, by providing both pressure and stress, can help improve drilling-window estimates.","PeriodicalId":196855,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, May 02, 2023","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, May 02, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/32555-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We predict pressure and stress in the 3D Mad Dog field using the Full Effective Stress (FES) pressure-prediction workflow. The FES workflow incorporates the full stress tensor (e.g., lateral stress and deviatoric stresses) into pressure prediction: it uses a geomechanical model to predict mean total and shear stresses in the 3D field and a relationship between velocity and equivalent effective stress (instead of vertical effective stress) to account for both mean- and shear-induced pore pressure generation. In complex geologic settings, such as salt basins or thrust belts, compaction depends on non-vertical and differential stresses; in such settings, the FES method offers a significant improvement over the traditional approach, that is based on the vertical effective stress. We focus our study on the anticline below the Mad Dog salt at the original platform area. We quantify the mean and shear-induced overpressures and show that shear-induced pressures account for 80% of the total overpressure in front of the salt. We also show that shear-induced pressures are the source of more than 1.5ppg overpressure in the anticline below salt, where the mean-stress approach alone predicts underpressures (less than hydrostatic). Higher pressures and the decrease in lateral stress in the anticline area lead to a 1ppg drilling window (defined in this paper as the difference between the pore pressure and minimum principal stress at any given depth). This drilling window is shifted to higher overpressures by 0.4ppg compared to the VES prediction. We find that the stress ratio in the mudrocks decreases to ~55% of its uniaxial value. Furthermore, we show that the velocity-informed geomechanical model is able to predict the pore pressure regression observed at Mad Dog and the regional hydraulic connectivity in the area. The three-dimansional (3D) geomechanical model is built in Horizon (Elfen). The known pressure regression in the sands is modeled; mudrock pore pressures are initialized using the VES estimate. Modified Cam Clay is used to quantify mean- and shear-induced compaction. Overall, we demonstrate that incorporating the full stress tensor is important for pressure and stress prediction at Mad Dog, and that the FES method, by providing both pressure and stress, can help improve drilling-window estimates.
三维疯狗压力和应力预测耦合地震速度,压力和应力测量
我们使用全有效应力(FES)压力预测工作流程来预测Mad Dog三维油田的压力和应力。FES工作流程将全应力张量(例如侧向应力和偏应力)整合到压力预测中:它使用地质力学模型来预测三维场中的平均总应力和剪应力,以及速度与等效有效应力(而不是垂直有效应力)之间的关系,以解释平均和剪切诱导的孔隙压力产生。在复杂的地质环境中,如盐盆地或逆冲带,压实作用取决于非垂直应力和差应力;在这种情况下,FES方法比基于垂直有效应力的传统方法有了显著的改进。本文重点研究了原地台区疯狗盐下的背斜。我们量化了平均超压和剪切引起的超压,发现剪切引起的超压占盐前总超压的80%。我们还表明,剪切诱导压力是盐下背斜中超过1.5ppg超压的来源,其中平均应力方法单独预测欠压(小于流体静力)。背斜区域压力的提高和侧应力的降低导致了1ppg的钻井窗口(本文将其定义为任意深度的孔隙压力与最小主应力之差)。与VES预测相比,该钻井窗口转移到更高的超压0.4ppg。研究发现,泥岩的应力比减小到单轴值的55%左右。此外,我们还表明,基于速度的地质力学模型能够预测Mad Dog观察到的孔隙压力回归和该地区的区域水力连通性。在Horizon (Elfen)中建立三维地质力学模型。对砂土中已知的压力回归进行了建模;泥岩孔隙压力初始化是利用地震探测系统估算的。改良的Cam Clay用于量化平均和剪切引起的压实。总的来说,我们证明了结合全应力张量对于Mad Dog的压力和应力预测是重要的,并且FES方法通过提供压力和应力,可以帮助改进钻井窗估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信