Measuring personal and academic differences in students' perceived social media credibility

Iqra Bashir, Amara Malik, K. Mahmood
{"title":"Measuring personal and academic differences in students' perceived social media credibility","authors":"Iqra Bashir, Amara Malik, K. Mahmood","doi":"10.1108/dlp-06-2021-0048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nSocial media is a popular source for information sharing in the contemporary world. Social media allow individuals to create, publish and diffuse contents directly. This openness has increased the risk of running into misinformation and raised questions about credibility of information shared. This study aims to examine the credibility of social media through the perceptions of university students. It also intends to see the difference in opinions based on their gender, academic disciplines and programs of study.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe study was based on a cross-sectional survey; a structured questionnaire was developed by consulting the relevant literature. Students were selected on convenient basis from all the programs of four universities of Faisalabad, Pakistan. Four hundred students were selected randomly from each university.\n\n\nFindings\nThe findings indicated that students considered social media partially credible. Currency, community wellness, understandability and completeness of information were the highly rated facets, while factual and unbiased information was the low rated aspects. The perceived credibility of social media among the university students was the same across genders, programs of study and academic disciplines.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe study may be helpful for social media service providers to address the concerns that students had in their perception regarding its credibility.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study may likely benefit faculty members, researchers, librarians/information professionals and digital libraries to understand the students’ concerns about social media credibility from a developing country’s perspective. Such understanding will enable them to better address, educate and train university students at how to evaluate the quality of information on social media by offering information literacy programs. It is direly needed that university libraries should train the students to be proficient in assessing the quality of information by offering information or digital literacy programs. Moreover, the study may be helpful for social media service providers to address the concerns that students had in their perception regarding its credibility.\n","PeriodicalId":438470,"journal":{"name":"Digit. Libr. Perspect.","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digit. Libr. Perspect.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dlp-06-2021-0048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose Social media is a popular source for information sharing in the contemporary world. Social media allow individuals to create, publish and diffuse contents directly. This openness has increased the risk of running into misinformation and raised questions about credibility of information shared. This study aims to examine the credibility of social media through the perceptions of university students. It also intends to see the difference in opinions based on their gender, academic disciplines and programs of study. Design/methodology/approach The study was based on a cross-sectional survey; a structured questionnaire was developed by consulting the relevant literature. Students were selected on convenient basis from all the programs of four universities of Faisalabad, Pakistan. Four hundred students were selected randomly from each university. Findings The findings indicated that students considered social media partially credible. Currency, community wellness, understandability and completeness of information were the highly rated facets, while factual and unbiased information was the low rated aspects. The perceived credibility of social media among the university students was the same across genders, programs of study and academic disciplines. Research limitations/implications The study may be helpful for social media service providers to address the concerns that students had in their perception regarding its credibility. Originality/value This study may likely benefit faculty members, researchers, librarians/information professionals and digital libraries to understand the students’ concerns about social media credibility from a developing country’s perspective. Such understanding will enable them to better address, educate and train university students at how to evaluate the quality of information on social media by offering information literacy programs. It is direly needed that university libraries should train the students to be proficient in assessing the quality of information by offering information or digital literacy programs. Moreover, the study may be helpful for social media service providers to address the concerns that students had in their perception regarding its credibility.
衡量学生感知社交媒体可信度的个人和学术差异
目的社交媒体是当今世界信息共享的流行来源。社交媒体允许个人直接创建、发布和传播内容。这种开放性增加了遇到错误信息的风险,并引发了对共享信息可信度的质疑。本研究旨在通过大学生的认知来检验社交媒体的可信度。它还打算了解基于性别、学科和学习项目的意见差异。设计/方法/方法本研究基于横断面调查;通过查阅相关文献,编制了一份结构化问卷。学生从巴基斯坦费萨拉巴德四所大学的所有项目中择优录取。从每所大学随机抽取400名学生。研究结果表明,学生认为社交媒体部分可信。货币、社区健康、信息的可理解性和完整性是评价较高的方面,而事实和公正的信息是评价较低的方面。大学生对社交媒体可信度的感知在性别、专业和学科上是相同的。研究的局限性/意义这项研究可能有助于社交媒体服务提供商解决学生对其可信度的看法。原创性/价值本研究可能有助于教师、研究人员、图书馆员/信息专业人员和数字图书馆从发展中国家的角度了解学生对社交媒体可信度的担忧。这样的理解将使他们能够通过提供信息素养课程,更好地解决、教育和培训大学生如何评估社交媒体上的信息质量。大学图书馆迫切需要通过提供信息或数字素养课程,培养学生熟练评估信息质量的能力。此外,该研究可能有助于社交媒体服务提供商解决学生对其可信度看法的担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信