A Multivariate and Latent Class Analysis of Consumer Decision Quality Measures in an E-Service Context

Lerzan Aksoy, B. Cooil
{"title":"A Multivariate and Latent Class Analysis of Consumer Decision Quality Measures in an E-Service Context","authors":"Lerzan Aksoy, B. Cooil","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.916566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Electronic recommendation agents have the potential to be valuable e-service tools in increasing consumer decision quality. Such agents are aimed at assisting consumers in the decision-making process and have the ability to enable consumers to make better choices for themselves. The definition of what constitutes a good choice in this context however remains unclear. Although a variety of approaches have been used to date, there is no consensus on the best measurement approach. This research reviews the various approaches in a variety of disciplines that have been used to define consumer decision quality to date, proposes new measures and a classification typology and examines the relationships among a subset of these measures from an online experimental choice task. Using multivariate and latent class analysis, the results demonstrate how different types of objective and subjective measures provide complementary ways of evaluating decisions and offer useful summaries of decision quality under a variety of conditions. The most important measures and five latent groups of individuals are identified. When individuals do not seem to make good decisions in terms of the individual measures, we propose an explanation of how their decisions are nearly optimal.","PeriodicalId":321301,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Marketing","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.916566","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Electronic recommendation agents have the potential to be valuable e-service tools in increasing consumer decision quality. Such agents are aimed at assisting consumers in the decision-making process and have the ability to enable consumers to make better choices for themselves. The definition of what constitutes a good choice in this context however remains unclear. Although a variety of approaches have been used to date, there is no consensus on the best measurement approach. This research reviews the various approaches in a variety of disciplines that have been used to define consumer decision quality to date, proposes new measures and a classification typology and examines the relationships among a subset of these measures from an online experimental choice task. Using multivariate and latent class analysis, the results demonstrate how different types of objective and subjective measures provide complementary ways of evaluating decisions and offer useful summaries of decision quality under a variety of conditions. The most important measures and five latent groups of individuals are identified. When individuals do not seem to make good decisions in terms of the individual measures, we propose an explanation of how their decisions are nearly optimal.
电子服务环境下消费者决策质量测度的多元潜类分析
电子推荐代理在提高消费者决策质量方面有潜力成为有价值的电子服务工具。这些代理的目的是帮助消费者在决策过程中,并有能力使消费者为自己做出更好的选择。然而,在这种情况下,什么是好的选择的定义仍然不清楚。尽管迄今为止已经使用了各种方法,但对最佳测量方法没有达成共识。本研究回顾了迄今为止用于定义消费者决策质量的各种学科的各种方法,提出了新的测量方法和分类类型,并从在线实验选择任务中检查了这些测量方法的子集之间的关系。使用多变量和潜在类分析,结果证明了不同类型的客观和主观度量如何提供评估决策的互补方式,并在各种条件下提供有用的决策质量总结。确定了最重要的措施和五个潜在的个体群体。当个体在个体度量方面似乎没有做出好的决策时,我们提出了一个解释,说明他们的决策是如何接近最优的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信