{"title":"A Machine Learning approach for the identification of CRISPR/Cas9 nuclease off-target for the treatment of Hemophilia","authors":"Anuraj Nayarisseri, Trishang Udhwani","doi":"10.3390/MOL2NET-05-06179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hemophilia can be defined as a genetic disorder in which the body loses its capability to clot blood, and hence can’t stop blood flow. It is an X- linked recessive disease, hence mostly seen in males, with its severity significantly reduced in females. In India, hemophilia has an occurrence of 1 per 10,000 births, which generally progresses to a chronic disability or premature death in subjects left untreated or provided with suboptimal treatment, a case prevalent in India [1]. The two major types of this condition are hemophilia A or factor VIII deficiency and hemophilia B or factor IX deficiency. In addition, hemophilia C is a rare category in which inhibitory antibodies develop which show high affinity to procoagulants, thus neutralizing the effect of a coagulation factor. Inhibitors are much less common in patients with hemophilia B than in those with hemophilia A. The F8 gene present on the X chromosome is responsible for guiding the production of coagulation factor VIII, essential for forming blood clots. In hemophilia A, mutation results from two gross (140 kbp or 600 kbp) chromosomal inversions that involve introns 1 and 22, respectively. Similarly, the F9 gene present on the X chromosome mutates through several different mechanisms to give rise to hemophilia B condition. The conditions associated with hemophilia Leyden, ribosome readthrough of nonsense mutation and apparently ‘silent’ changes that do not alter amino acids are the major mutations studied. It has been observed that reconstitution with 1–2% of the clotting factor helps uplift the quality of life, while 5–20% reconstitution is required to ameliorate the genetic disorder. Gene-specific genome editing is preferred over random integration of expression cassettes as this helps avoid genotoxicity and achieve the required physiological levels of expression. Advances in genome engineering based on CRISPR- associated RNA- guided endonuclease Cas9 are empowering the guidance of the said endonuclease to target locations by a short RNA search string [2]. It requires a programmable sequence-specific RNA to direct it and introduce cleavage and double-stranded breaks at the target site. In case of hemophilia A, induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) can be derived from patients with inversion genotypes with an aim to revert these chromosomal conditions to the corrected state with the assistance of CRISPR- Cas9 nucleases [3]. The endothelial cells from the corrected iPSCs can be checked for expression of F8 gene and the production of factor VIII. Likewise, in case of hemophilia B, delivery of naked Cas9-sgRNA plasmid and donor DNA, aiming to recover the mutation has shown a detectable gene correction (>1%) in F9 alleles of hepatocytes [4]. To construct the related plasmids, an AAVS1-Cas9-sgRNA plasmid is designed to cut the AAVSI locus in human. Subsequently, two donor plasmids are designed to insert GFP and F9 cDNA into the designated AAVS1 locus. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) is used in combination with this editing method to identify off-target mutations, to ensure that editing takes place at the desired site. The technique offers several benefits over the popularly used Adeno- associated viral (AAV) vectors such as precision, decreased insertional oncogenesis and control through an endogenous promoter [5]. The CRISPR/Cas9- mediated genome editing with an AAV8 vector has been put to use to provide an adjustable path to induce double-strand breaks at the target genes in hepatocytes [6]. The foremost need for CRISPR-Cas9 is the identification of targets that have undergone a mutation, which has led to the development of the said condition. Although a few targets are known, none of the target mutation has been capable to render a 5-20 percent of reconstitution that is required for the elimination of the disorder. Hence, there is a need to find novel targets for the CRISPR-Cas9 system, which in turn requires the assistance of computational tools. The aim of this study is to identify positive CRISPR-Cas9 targets which would help in better and more accurate treatment of the disorder with computational biology facilitating the research. The study provide targets which possess minimum off-target mutations, providing maximum reconstitution for hemophilia. \n \nReferences \n [1] Kar, A., Phadnis, S., Dharmarajan, S., & Nakade, J. (2014). Epidemiology & social costs of haemophilia in India. The Indian journal of medical research, 140(1), 19. \n [2] Hsu, P. D., Lander, E. S., & Zhang, F. (2014). Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering. Cell, 157(6), 1262-1278. \n [3] Park, C. Y., Kim, D. H., Son, J. S., Sung, J. J., Lee, J., Bae, S., ... & Kim, J. S. (2015). Functional correction of large factor VIII gene chromosomal inversions in hemophilia A patient-derived iPSCs using CRISPR-Cas9. Cell stem cell, 17(2), 213-220. \n [4] Huai, C., Jia, C., Sun, R., Xu, P., Min, T., Wang, Q., ... & Lu, D. (2017). CRISPR/Cas9-mediated somatic and germline gene correction to restore hemostasis in hemophilia B mice. Human genetics, 136(7), 875-883. \n [5] Doshi, B. S., & Arruda, V. R. (2018). Gene therapy for hemophilia: what does the future hold?.Therapeutic advances in hematology, 9(9), 273-293. \n [6] Ohmori, T., Nagao, Y., Mizukami, H., Sakata, A., Muramatsu, S. I., Ozawa, K., ... & Sakata, Y. (2017). CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing via postnatal administration of AAV vector cures haemophilia B mice. Scientific reports, 7(1), 4159.","PeriodicalId":337320,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of MOL2NET 2019, International Conference on Multidisciplinary Sciences, 5th edition","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of MOL2NET 2019, International Conference on Multidisciplinary Sciences, 5th edition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/MOL2NET-05-06179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Hemophilia can be defined as a genetic disorder in which the body loses its capability to clot blood, and hence can’t stop blood flow. It is an X- linked recessive disease, hence mostly seen in males, with its severity significantly reduced in females. In India, hemophilia has an occurrence of 1 per 10,000 births, which generally progresses to a chronic disability or premature death in subjects left untreated or provided with suboptimal treatment, a case prevalent in India [1]. The two major types of this condition are hemophilia A or factor VIII deficiency and hemophilia B or factor IX deficiency. In addition, hemophilia C is a rare category in which inhibitory antibodies develop which show high affinity to procoagulants, thus neutralizing the effect of a coagulation factor. Inhibitors are much less common in patients with hemophilia B than in those with hemophilia A. The F8 gene present on the X chromosome is responsible for guiding the production of coagulation factor VIII, essential for forming blood clots. In hemophilia A, mutation results from two gross (140 kbp or 600 kbp) chromosomal inversions that involve introns 1 and 22, respectively. Similarly, the F9 gene present on the X chromosome mutates through several different mechanisms to give rise to hemophilia B condition. The conditions associated with hemophilia Leyden, ribosome readthrough of nonsense mutation and apparently ‘silent’ changes that do not alter amino acids are the major mutations studied. It has been observed that reconstitution with 1–2% of the clotting factor helps uplift the quality of life, while 5–20% reconstitution is required to ameliorate the genetic disorder. Gene-specific genome editing is preferred over random integration of expression cassettes as this helps avoid genotoxicity and achieve the required physiological levels of expression. Advances in genome engineering based on CRISPR- associated RNA- guided endonuclease Cas9 are empowering the guidance of the said endonuclease to target locations by a short RNA search string [2]. It requires a programmable sequence-specific RNA to direct it and introduce cleavage and double-stranded breaks at the target site. In case of hemophilia A, induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) can be derived from patients with inversion genotypes with an aim to revert these chromosomal conditions to the corrected state with the assistance of CRISPR- Cas9 nucleases [3]. The endothelial cells from the corrected iPSCs can be checked for expression of F8 gene and the production of factor VIII. Likewise, in case of hemophilia B, delivery of naked Cas9-sgRNA plasmid and donor DNA, aiming to recover the mutation has shown a detectable gene correction (>1%) in F9 alleles of hepatocytes [4]. To construct the related plasmids, an AAVS1-Cas9-sgRNA plasmid is designed to cut the AAVSI locus in human. Subsequently, two donor plasmids are designed to insert GFP and F9 cDNA into the designated AAVS1 locus. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) is used in combination with this editing method to identify off-target mutations, to ensure that editing takes place at the desired site. The technique offers several benefits over the popularly used Adeno- associated viral (AAV) vectors such as precision, decreased insertional oncogenesis and control through an endogenous promoter [5]. The CRISPR/Cas9- mediated genome editing with an AAV8 vector has been put to use to provide an adjustable path to induce double-strand breaks at the target genes in hepatocytes [6]. The foremost need for CRISPR-Cas9 is the identification of targets that have undergone a mutation, which has led to the development of the said condition. Although a few targets are known, none of the target mutation has been capable to render a 5-20 percent of reconstitution that is required for the elimination of the disorder. Hence, there is a need to find novel targets for the CRISPR-Cas9 system, which in turn requires the assistance of computational tools. The aim of this study is to identify positive CRISPR-Cas9 targets which would help in better and more accurate treatment of the disorder with computational biology facilitating the research. The study provide targets which possess minimum off-target mutations, providing maximum reconstitution for hemophilia.
References
[1] Kar, A., Phadnis, S., Dharmarajan, S., & Nakade, J. (2014). Epidemiology & social costs of haemophilia in India. The Indian journal of medical research, 140(1), 19.
[2] Hsu, P. D., Lander, E. S., & Zhang, F. (2014). Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering. Cell, 157(6), 1262-1278.
[3] Park, C. Y., Kim, D. H., Son, J. S., Sung, J. J., Lee, J., Bae, S., ... & Kim, J. S. (2015). Functional correction of large factor VIII gene chromosomal inversions in hemophilia A patient-derived iPSCs using CRISPR-Cas9. Cell stem cell, 17(2), 213-220.
[4] Huai, C., Jia, C., Sun, R., Xu, P., Min, T., Wang, Q., ... & Lu, D. (2017). CRISPR/Cas9-mediated somatic and germline gene correction to restore hemostasis in hemophilia B mice. Human genetics, 136(7), 875-883.
[5] Doshi, B. S., & Arruda, V. R. (2018). Gene therapy for hemophilia: what does the future hold?.Therapeutic advances in hematology, 9(9), 273-293.
[6] Ohmori, T., Nagao, Y., Mizukami, H., Sakata, A., Muramatsu, S. I., Ozawa, K., ... & Sakata, Y. (2017). CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing via postnatal administration of AAV vector cures haemophilia B mice. Scientific reports, 7(1), 4159.
血友病可以被定义为一种遗传性疾病,其中身体失去了凝血能力,因此无法阻止血液流动。它是一种X连锁隐性疾病,因此多见于男性,其严重程度在女性中显著降低。在印度,血友病的发病率为万分之一,如果不及时治疗或治疗不理想,血友病通常会发展为慢性残疾或过早死亡,这种情况在印度非常普遍。这种情况的两种主要类型是血友病A或因子VIII缺乏症和血友病B或因子IX缺乏症。此外,C型血友病是一种罕见的类型,其中抑制抗体的产生对促凝剂表现出高亲和力,从而中和凝血因子的作用。抑制剂在B型血友病患者中比在a型血友病患者中少得多。存在于X染色体上的F8基因负责指导凝血因子VIII的产生,凝血因子VIII是形成血凝块所必需的。在A型血友病中,突变由两个总(140 kbp或600 kbp)染色体倒位引起,分别涉及内含子1和22。同样,存在于X染色体上的F9基因通过几种不同的机制发生突变,从而导致血友病B。与莱登血友病相关的条件,核糖体无义突变的解读,以及明显的“沉默”变化,不改变氨基酸是研究的主要突变。据观察,1-2%的凝血因子重组有助于提高生活质量,而5-20%的重组需要改善遗传疾病。基因特异性基因组编辑优于随机整合表达磁带,因为这有助于避免遗传毒性并达到所需的生理表达水平。基于CRISPR相关RNA引导的核酸内切酶Cas9的基因组工程进展,使所述核酸内切酶能够通过短RNA搜索串[2]引导到目标位置。它需要一个可编程的序列特异性RNA来指导它,并在目标位点引入切割和双链断裂。对于A型血友病,诱导多能干细胞(iPSCs)可以从基因型倒置的患者中获得,目的是在CRISPR- Cas9核酸酶[3]的帮助下将这些染色体状况恢复到正确状态。校正后的iPSCs内皮细胞可以检测F8基因的表达和因子VIII的产生。同样,在B型血友病中,为了恢复突变,将裸Cas9-sgRNA质粒和供体DNA传递给肝细胞[4]的F9等位基因,显示出可检测到的基因校正(>1%)。为了构建相关质粒,我们设计了AAVS1-Cas9-sgRNA质粒来切割人AAVSI基因座。随后,设计两个供体质粒,将GFP和F9 cDNA插入指定的AAVS1位点。全基因组测序(WGS)与这种编辑方法相结合,用于识别脱靶突变,以确保在所需的位点进行编辑。与常用的腺相关病毒(AAV)载体相比,该技术具有精度、减少插入性肿瘤发生和通过内源性启动子[5]控制等优点。CRISPR/Cas9介导的AAV8载体基因组编辑已被用于提供可调节的路径,以诱导肝细胞[6]靶基因的双链断裂。CRISPR-Cas9的首要需求是鉴定发生突变的靶标,这导致了上述疾病的发展。虽然已知一些靶标,但没有一个靶标突变能够实现消除这种疾病所需的5- 20%的重组。因此,有必要为CRISPR-Cas9系统寻找新的靶点,这反过来又需要计算工具的帮助。本研究的目的是确定阳性的CRISPR-Cas9靶点,这将有助于更好,更准确地治疗疾病,计算生物学促进研究。该研究提供了具有最小脱靶突变的靶标,为血友病提供了最大的重建。参考文献[10]Kar, A, Phadnis, S, Dharmarajan, S, and Nakade, J.(2014)。印度血友病的流行病学和社会成本。《印度医学研究杂志》,140(1),第19页。[2], p D。兰德,e·S。&张f(2014)。CRISPR-Cas9在基因组工程中的发展与应用Cell, 157(6), 1262-1278。[3], c . Y。金,d·H。儿子,J·S。唱,J . J。李,J。,Bae, S。,……& Kim J. S.(2015)。使用CRISPR-Cas9对血友病A患者来源的iPSCs中大因子VIII基因染色体倒位的功能校正细胞干细胞,17(2),213-220。[4]淮河、C。,C,太阳,R,徐,P, Min, T, Wang Q。,……&卢D.(2017)。