Computed tomography imaging parameters for inhomogeneity correction in radiation treatment planning

I. Das, Chee-Wai Cheng, M. Cao, P. Johnstone
{"title":"Computed tomography imaging parameters for inhomogeneity correction in radiation treatment planning","authors":"I. Das, Chee-Wai Cheng, M. Cao, P. Johnstone","doi":"10.4103/0971-6203.177277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modern treatment planning systems provide accurate dosimetry in heterogeneous media (such as a patient' body) with the help of tissue characterization based on computed tomography (CT) number. However, CT number depends on the type of scanner, tube voltage, field of view (FOV), reconstruction algorithm including artifact reduction and processing filters. The impact of these parameters on CT to electron density (ED) conversion had been subject of investigation for treatment planning in various clinical situations. This is usually performed with a tissue characterization phantom with various density plugs acquired with different tube voltages (kilovoltage peak), FOV reconstruction and different scanners to generate CT number to ED tables. This article provides an overview of inhomogeneity correction in the context of CT scanning and a new evaluation tool, difference volume dose-volume histogram (DVH), dV-DVH. It has been concluded that scanner and CT parameters are important for tissue characterizations, but changes in ED are minimal and only pronounced for higher density materials. For lungs, changes in CT number are minimal among scanners and CT parameters. Dosimetric differences for lung and prostate cases are usually insignificant (<2%) in three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and < 5% for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with CT parameters. It could be concluded that CT number variability is dependent on acquisition parameters, but its dosimetric impact is pronounced only in high-density media and possibly in IMRT. In view of such small dosimetric changes in low-density medium, the acquisition of additional CT data for financially difficult clinics and countries may not be warranted.","PeriodicalId":143694,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Physics / Association of Medical Physicists of India","volume":"450 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"34","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Physics / Association of Medical Physicists of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.177277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

Abstract

Modern treatment planning systems provide accurate dosimetry in heterogeneous media (such as a patient' body) with the help of tissue characterization based on computed tomography (CT) number. However, CT number depends on the type of scanner, tube voltage, field of view (FOV), reconstruction algorithm including artifact reduction and processing filters. The impact of these parameters on CT to electron density (ED) conversion had been subject of investigation for treatment planning in various clinical situations. This is usually performed with a tissue characterization phantom with various density plugs acquired with different tube voltages (kilovoltage peak), FOV reconstruction and different scanners to generate CT number to ED tables. This article provides an overview of inhomogeneity correction in the context of CT scanning and a new evaluation tool, difference volume dose-volume histogram (DVH), dV-DVH. It has been concluded that scanner and CT parameters are important for tissue characterizations, but changes in ED are minimal and only pronounced for higher density materials. For lungs, changes in CT number are minimal among scanners and CT parameters. Dosimetric differences for lung and prostate cases are usually insignificant (<2%) in three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and < 5% for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with CT parameters. It could be concluded that CT number variability is dependent on acquisition parameters, but its dosimetric impact is pronounced only in high-density media and possibly in IMRT. In view of such small dosimetric changes in low-density medium, the acquisition of additional CT data for financially difficult clinics and countries may not be warranted.
放射治疗计划中不均匀性校正的计算机断层成像参数
现代治疗计划系统在基于计算机断层扫描(CT)数字的组织特征的帮助下,在异质介质(如患者身体)中提供准确的剂量测定。然而,CT数取决于扫描仪的类型、管电压、视场(FOV)、包括伪影减少和处理滤波器在内的重建算法。这些参数对CT到电子密度(ED)转换的影响已被研究用于各种临床情况下的治疗计划。这通常是通过不同的管电压(千伏峰值)、FOV重建和不同的扫描仪获得不同密度塞的组织表征模体来完成的,以生成ED表的CT数。本文综述了CT扫描中的非均匀性校正以及一种新的评估工具——差体积剂量-体积直方图(DVH)。结论是,扫描仪和CT参数对组织表征很重要,但ED的变化很小,仅在高密度材料中才明显。对于肺部,CT数的变化在扫描仪和CT参数中最小。在三维适形放射治疗中,肺和前列腺病例的剂量学差异通常不显著(<2%),在CT参数的调强放射治疗(IMRT)中,剂量学差异小于5%。可以得出结论,CT数的可变性取决于采集参数,但其剂量学影响仅在高密度介质中明显,可能在IMRT中。鉴于低密度介质中如此小的剂量变化,可能不需要为财政困难的诊所和国家获取额外的CT数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信