The ‘male preserve’ thesis, sporting culture, and men’s power

Christopher R. Matthews, A. Channon
{"title":"The ‘male preserve’ thesis, sporting culture, and men’s power","authors":"Christopher R. Matthews, A. Channon","doi":"10.4324/9781315165165-37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the mid-nineteenth century, when the modern Westernised form of competition sport took shape, there has been a shifting yet robustly gendered structure to the experience of playing, consuming, managing, teaching and marketing sport. In this regard, save for a number of important examples, sports in various forms were created by men, for men (and boys). In light of this, critical studies of men, masculinity and sport culture have emerged as a major area of research in the sociology of sport (e.g., Dunning, 1986; Messner, 1992; Messner and Sabo, 1990; Pronger, 1990). Drawing on various feminist, social constructionist, or poststructuralist theories of gender, these scholars argued that sport served to sustain symbolic idealisations of male power, normalise the marginality of women, and reinforce rigid status hierarchies among men themselves. In exposing the inequalities enshrined within sports culture, along with the manifold dangers endured by boys and men in the stakes of ‘proving’ masculinity in and through sport, this body of scholarship placed the potentially harmful nature of the masculinity-sport relationship firmly into the academic discourse on sport and society.","PeriodicalId":402024,"journal":{"name":"Routledge International Handbook of Masculinity Studies","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Routledge International Handbook of Masculinity Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165165-37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Since the mid-nineteenth century, when the modern Westernised form of competition sport took shape, there has been a shifting yet robustly gendered structure to the experience of playing, consuming, managing, teaching and marketing sport. In this regard, save for a number of important examples, sports in various forms were created by men, for men (and boys). In light of this, critical studies of men, masculinity and sport culture have emerged as a major area of research in the sociology of sport (e.g., Dunning, 1986; Messner, 1992; Messner and Sabo, 1990; Pronger, 1990). Drawing on various feminist, social constructionist, or poststructuralist theories of gender, these scholars argued that sport served to sustain symbolic idealisations of male power, normalise the marginality of women, and reinforce rigid status hierarchies among men themselves. In exposing the inequalities enshrined within sports culture, along with the manifold dangers endured by boys and men in the stakes of ‘proving’ masculinity in and through sport, this body of scholarship placed the potentially harmful nature of the masculinity-sport relationship firmly into the academic discourse on sport and society.
“男性保留”理论、体育文化和男性力量
自19世纪中期,现代西方化的竞技体育形式形成以来,在体育运动的体验、消费、管理、教学和营销方面,已经出现了一种强烈的性别结构转变。在这方面,除了一些重要的例子外,各种形式的运动都是由男人创造的,为男人(和男孩)创造的。有鉴于此,对男性、男子气概和体育文化的批判性研究已成为体育社会学的一个主要研究领域(例如,Dunning, 1986;Messner, 1992;Messner and Sabo, 1990;刺,1990)。根据各种女权主义、社会建构主义或后结构主义的性别理论,这些学者认为,体育有助于维持男性权力的象征性理想化,使女性的边缘化正常化,并加强男性之间严格的地位等级制度。在揭露体育文化中的不平等,以及男孩和男人在体育中通过体育“证明”男子气概所承受的多重危险的过程中,这一学术机构将男子气概-体育关系的潜在有害性质牢牢地置于体育和社会的学术话语中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信