Regarding the use of special knowledge by an expert on legal issues in the criminal procedure of Ukraine

Oleg A. Parfylo, Maryna Nadizhko
{"title":"Regarding the use of special knowledge by an expert on legal issues in the\ncriminal procedure of Ukraine","authors":"Oleg A. Parfylo, Maryna Nadizhko","doi":"10.54658/ssu.27097978.2021.1.pp.22-32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the study of the feasibility of introducing the institute of expertise in the field of law in the domestic criminal process. The correlation and interrelation of special and well-known knowledge is analyzed. The content of special knowledge possessed by a forensic expert as a complex concept, including professional knowledge in the field of science, art, technology and craft, which are not publicly available and well-known, as well as certain skills and abilities how to apply them in order to obtain such a procedural source of evidence as an expert opinion.\nThe peculiarities of the world experience of realization of the institute «amicus curiae» both in the countries of continental law and in the Anglo-Saxon legal system states are studied. It is noted that the subject and task of such expertise in foreign countries is the interpretation of legal norms in law enforcement practice, the establishment of compliance of certain legal facts with the current legislation requirements. \nThe possibility of using legal knowledge by a forensic expert is determined, in particular, it is proposed the author's concept that the expert opinion on legal issues (as, in fact, the conclusion of a forensic expert) will not have an obligatory value, and its strength is in the rationality of arguments, reasoning of conclusions and proposals. It is noted that the opinion of a specialist in the field of law does not oblige to make a decision in favor of a particular participant in the process, but makes you think and motivate your actions, especially those participants in the process who are endowed with authority. \nAccording to the results of the study, it is substantiated that the involvement of legal experts in the domestic criminal process will be the key to making fair and reasoned decisions. The advantages and possible consequences of the legal expertise introduction of are highlighted, the relevant amendments to the CPC of Ukraine and recommendations for obtaining the status of a participant in criminal proceedings by a legal expert are proposed.","PeriodicalId":427922,"journal":{"name":"Collection of Ukrainian Research Institute of Special Equipment and Forensic Expertise of the Security Service OF Ukraine","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collection of Ukrainian Research Institute of Special Equipment and Forensic Expertise of the Security Service OF Ukraine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54658/ssu.27097978.2021.1.pp.22-32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of the feasibility of introducing the institute of expertise in the field of law in the domestic criminal process. The correlation and interrelation of special and well-known knowledge is analyzed. The content of special knowledge possessed by a forensic expert as a complex concept, including professional knowledge in the field of science, art, technology and craft, which are not publicly available and well-known, as well as certain skills and abilities how to apply them in order to obtain such a procedural source of evidence as an expert opinion. The peculiarities of the world experience of realization of the institute «amicus curiae» both in the countries of continental law and in the Anglo-Saxon legal system states are studied. It is noted that the subject and task of such expertise in foreign countries is the interpretation of legal norms in law enforcement practice, the establishment of compliance of certain legal facts with the current legislation requirements. The possibility of using legal knowledge by a forensic expert is determined, in particular, it is proposed the author's concept that the expert opinion on legal issues (as, in fact, the conclusion of a forensic expert) will not have an obligatory value, and its strength is in the rationality of arguments, reasoning of conclusions and proposals. It is noted that the opinion of a specialist in the field of law does not oblige to make a decision in favor of a particular participant in the process, but makes you think and motivate your actions, especially those participants in the process who are endowed with authority. According to the results of the study, it is substantiated that the involvement of legal experts in the domestic criminal process will be the key to making fair and reasoned decisions. The advantages and possible consequences of the legal expertise introduction of are highlighted, the relevant amendments to the CPC of Ukraine and recommendations for obtaining the status of a participant in criminal proceedings by a legal expert are proposed.
关于乌克兰刑事诉讼中法律问题专家的专业知识的使用
本文致力于研究在国内刑事诉讼中引入法律领域专门知识制度的可行性。分析了专业知识与知名知识的相关性和相互关系。法医专家所拥有的专业知识的内容是一个复杂的概念,包括在科学、艺术、技术和工艺领域中不为公众所知的专业知识,以及如何运用这些专业知识以获得作为专家意见的程序性证据来源的一定技能和能力。研究了大陆法系国家和盎格鲁-撒克逊法系国家实现“法庭之友”制度的世界经验的特殊性。值得注意的是,在国外,这种专门知识的主题和任务是解释执法实践中的法律规范,确定某些法律事实是否符合现行立法要求。确定了法医专家运用法律知识的可能性,特别是提出了笔者关于法律问题的专家意见(实际上是法医专家的结论)不具有强制性价值的概念,其力量在于论证、结论推理和建议的合理性。值得注意的是,法律领域专家的意见并不迫使你作出有利于某一进程参与者的决定,而是促使你思考和激励你的行动,特别是那些被赋予权力的进程参与者。根据研究结果,证明法律专家参与国内刑事诉讼程序将是作出公正和合理决定的关键。强调了引入法律专门知识的优点和可能产生的后果,对乌克兰方案协调会进行了有关修正,并提出了法律专家获得刑事诉讼参与人地位的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信