Anxiety, Ambivalence and Sublimation: Ontological In/security and the World Risk Society

J. Cash
{"title":"Anxiety, Ambivalence and Sublimation: Ontological In/security and the World Risk Society","authors":"J. Cash","doi":"10.33458/uidergisi.1094378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"* The first version of this article was presented at the EWIS 2020 (on-line) Workshop on “Anxiety in international relations” convened by Bahar Rumelili and Karl Gustafsson. I wish to thank them and the several other participants in this Workshop, for their thoughtful engagement with my paper and for the antidote to Covid-isolation offered by their own stimulating papers. In very anxious times we all negotiated “anxiety in international relations” and other settings in very creative and collaborative ways. I am especially grateful for the valuable and extensive comments on my workshop paper offered by Jakub Eberle. In revising the paper for publication, I have benefitted from further valuable comments and advice from Bahar Rumelili, in her role as editor of this special issue, and from the two anonymous reviewers, whose suggestions I found very helpful. ABSTRACT This article aims to expand the social-theoretical and psychoanalytic range of research on ontological in/ security, by exploring parallel concerns addressed by Beck, Kristeva, Butler and Zizek. These include, first, the psychic roots of othering processes and their encoding into cultural repertoires. Second, the difficulties and possibilities of displacing othering processes within national and international politics. Third, the disruptive effects of globalising processes on the symbolic efficiency of cultures and on their encoded defences against ontological insecurity. Fourth, the crucial significance for political and international relations of the qualitative characteristics of those defences against ontological insecurity that gain predominance within cultural repertoires and their variable norms of recognition. Likewise, the significance of those norms of recognition that challenge established norms and successfully reorganise cultural repertoires. we any form of big any symbolic point of reference that would serve as a safe and unproblematic moral anchor.”","PeriodicalId":414004,"journal":{"name":"Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi","volume":"100 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.1094378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

* The first version of this article was presented at the EWIS 2020 (on-line) Workshop on “Anxiety in international relations” convened by Bahar Rumelili and Karl Gustafsson. I wish to thank them and the several other participants in this Workshop, for their thoughtful engagement with my paper and for the antidote to Covid-isolation offered by their own stimulating papers. In very anxious times we all negotiated “anxiety in international relations” and other settings in very creative and collaborative ways. I am especially grateful for the valuable and extensive comments on my workshop paper offered by Jakub Eberle. In revising the paper for publication, I have benefitted from further valuable comments and advice from Bahar Rumelili, in her role as editor of this special issue, and from the two anonymous reviewers, whose suggestions I found very helpful. ABSTRACT This article aims to expand the social-theoretical and psychoanalytic range of research on ontological in/ security, by exploring parallel concerns addressed by Beck, Kristeva, Butler and Zizek. These include, first, the psychic roots of othering processes and their encoding into cultural repertoires. Second, the difficulties and possibilities of displacing othering processes within national and international politics. Third, the disruptive effects of globalising processes on the symbolic efficiency of cultures and on their encoded defences against ontological insecurity. Fourth, the crucial significance for political and international relations of the qualitative characteristics of those defences against ontological insecurity that gain predominance within cultural repertoires and their variable norms of recognition. Likewise, the significance of those norms of recognition that challenge established norms and successfully reorganise cultural repertoires. we any form of big any symbolic point of reference that would serve as a safe and unproblematic moral anchor.”
焦虑、矛盾与升华:本体论的安全与世界风险社会
*本文首版发表于2020年世界经济信息研究所(EWIS)鲁梅利、古斯塔夫松举办的“国际关系中的焦虑”研讨会上。我要感谢他们和本次研讨会的其他几位与会者,感谢他们对我的论文进行了深思熟虑的参与,并感谢他们自己令人振奋的论文为covid - 19隔离提供了解药。在非常焦虑的时期,我们都以非常有创意和合作的方式来谈判“国际关系中的焦虑”和其他环境。我特别感谢Jakub Eberle对我的研讨会文件提出的宝贵和广泛的评论。在修改论文以供发表的过程中,我从本期特刊编辑Bahar Rumelili和两位匿名审稿人的进一步宝贵意见和建议中受益,他们的建议对我很有帮助。本文旨在通过探讨贝克、克里斯蒂娃、巴特勒和齐泽克对安全本体论的平行关注,拓展社会理论和精神分析研究的范围。这些包括,首先,其他过程的精神根源及其编码到文化曲目中。第二,在国家和国际政治中取代其他进程的困难和可能性。第三,全球化进程对文化的象征效率及其对本体论不安全的编码防御的破坏性影响。第四,对于政治和国际关系而言,在文化曲目及其可变的识别规范中获得优势的那些针对本体论不安全的防御的质量特征具有至关重要的意义。同样,那些挑战既定规范并成功重组文化剧目的认可规范的意义。我们需要任何形式的大的,任何象征性的参考点,作为一个安全的,没有问题的道德锚。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信