An Eerie Cacaphony: Forms of the Collective in Occupy Novels

Steven Watts
{"title":"An Eerie Cacaphony: Forms of the Collective in Occupy Novels","authors":"Steven Watts","doi":"10.16995/c21.1438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Novels that were written about or inspired by the Occupy movement in 2011 are often praised for their attempts at representing the collectivity of the movement. Using the framework of governance infrastructure as provided by Anna Feigenbaum, Fabian Frenzel, and Patrick McCurdy, this article examines what infrastructural practices facilitated collectivity in Occupy and theorizes how post-Occupy novels have formalized those practices. I look at two novels, Ben Lerner’s 2014 novel 10:04 and Rachel Kushner’s 2013 novel The Flamethrowers to demonstrate how post-Occupy novels embody the collective voice of the Occupy movement to varying degrees of success. This article closely reads both novels to illustrate how voice is informed by collective protest strategies and proposes that such use of voice is a development new to post-Occupy novels and signals an awareness of how structures of fiction imitate state infrastructure.  Publisher's note: This article was originally published with the title 'An Eerie Cacaphony: Forms of the Collective in Occupy Novels'. This has now been corrected.","PeriodicalId":272809,"journal":{"name":"C21 Literature: Journal of 21st-Century Writings","volume":"90 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"C21 Literature: Journal of 21st-Century Writings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16995/c21.1438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Novels that were written about or inspired by the Occupy movement in 2011 are often praised for their attempts at representing the collectivity of the movement. Using the framework of governance infrastructure as provided by Anna Feigenbaum, Fabian Frenzel, and Patrick McCurdy, this article examines what infrastructural practices facilitated collectivity in Occupy and theorizes how post-Occupy novels have formalized those practices. I look at two novels, Ben Lerner’s 2014 novel 10:04 and Rachel Kushner’s 2013 novel The Flamethrowers to demonstrate how post-Occupy novels embody the collective voice of the Occupy movement to varying degrees of success. This article closely reads both novels to illustrate how voice is informed by collective protest strategies and proposes that such use of voice is a development new to post-Occupy novels and signals an awareness of how structures of fiction imitate state infrastructure.  Publisher's note: This article was originally published with the title 'An Eerie Cacaphony: Forms of the Collective in Occupy Novels'. This has now been corrected.
怪诞的幻境:“占领”小说中的集体形式
关于2011年“占领华尔街”运动的小说或受其启发的小说,往往因为试图表现这场运动的集体性而受到称赞。利用Anna Feigenbaum、Fabian Frenzel和Patrick McCurdy提供的治理基础架构框架,本文考察了哪些基础架构实践促进了“占领”运动中的集体性,并对后“占领”小说如何将这些实践形式化进行了理论化。我看了两本小说,本·勒纳2014年的小说《10:04》和瑞秋·库什纳2013年的小说《火焰喷火器》,以展示占领运动后的小说如何体现了占领运动的集体声音,并取得了不同程度的成功。本文将仔细阅读这两部小说,以说明声音是如何被集体抗议策略所影响的,并提出这种声音的使用是后占领时期小说的一种新发展,标志着小说结构如何模仿国家基础设施的意识。出版商注:这篇文章最初的标题是“怪异的Cacaphony:占领小说中的集体形式”。现在这个问题已经得到了纠正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信