The Effect of Reflective Journal Authentic Assessment on Students’ Writing Competence and Motivation

Jojor Siahaan, M. Ping, Aridah Aridah, Y. Asih
{"title":"The Effect of Reflective Journal Authentic Assessment on Students’ Writing Competence and Motivation","authors":"Jojor Siahaan, M. Ping, Aridah Aridah, Y. Asih","doi":"10.30872/escs.v1i1.866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several studies on Reflective Journal Writing (RJW) have highlighted the positive learning experiences either in writing skills or writing competence. However, most of them were for adult students. This study aimed to see it in high school students as demanded in the syllabus 2013. The respondents were 70 from the 360 population by using simple random sampling. A Mix-method approach answered the research questions with the writing competence, questionnaire, and interview instruments. The treatment group got the reflective journal writing while the control group without reflective journal writing six times. Pretest applied before the treatment and posttest after treatment and followed with a questionnaire and an interview. The data analysis used two-way manova, paired sample t-test, independent t-test, and Interview. The effect size shown in Eta Square for motivation was 86.4% or 0.864 categorized large effect and for writing 9.6% or 0.096 categorized moderate effect. RJW had a significant simultaneous effect on students’ writing competence and motivation. The correlation of students’ writing partially was .527. It was bigger than .05. RJW had a partial effect on students’ writing competence. For motivation, the significance value was 7.488 meant that RJW had a partial effect. It supported with Qual analysis that showed on students’ willingness, desires of doing something, fun activity, enjoyment activity, satisfaction, and effort of facing problems. In conclusion, RJW was significant to increase or improve either students’ writing competence or motivation.","PeriodicalId":236405,"journal":{"name":"Educational Studies: Conference Series","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Studies: Conference Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30872/escs.v1i1.866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Several studies on Reflective Journal Writing (RJW) have highlighted the positive learning experiences either in writing skills or writing competence. However, most of them were for adult students. This study aimed to see it in high school students as demanded in the syllabus 2013. The respondents were 70 from the 360 population by using simple random sampling. A Mix-method approach answered the research questions with the writing competence, questionnaire, and interview instruments. The treatment group got the reflective journal writing while the control group without reflective journal writing six times. Pretest applied before the treatment and posttest after treatment and followed with a questionnaire and an interview. The data analysis used two-way manova, paired sample t-test, independent t-test, and Interview. The effect size shown in Eta Square for motivation was 86.4% or 0.864 categorized large effect and for writing 9.6% or 0.096 categorized moderate effect. RJW had a significant simultaneous effect on students’ writing competence and motivation. The correlation of students’ writing partially was .527. It was bigger than .05. RJW had a partial effect on students’ writing competence. For motivation, the significance value was 7.488 meant that RJW had a partial effect. It supported with Qual analysis that showed on students’ willingness, desires of doing something, fun activity, enjoyment activity, satisfaction, and effort of facing problems. In conclusion, RJW was significant to increase or improve either students’ writing competence or motivation.
反思性日记真实性评价对学生写作能力和写作动机的影响
一些关于反思性日记写作(RJW)的研究强调了在写作技巧或写作能力方面的积极学习经验。然而,大多数是针对成年学生的。本研究旨在根据2013年教学大纲的要求,在高中学生中看到它。调查对象为360人中的70人,采用简单随机抽样法。采用混合方法,通过写作能力、问卷调查和访谈工具来回答研究问题。治疗组进行反思性日记写作,对照组不进行反思性日记写作,共6次。治疗前进行前测,治疗后进行后测,然后进行问卷调查和访谈。数据分析采用双向方差分析、配对样本t检验、独立t检验和访谈法。在Eta平方中,动机的效应量为86.4%或0.864,属于大效应;写作的效应量为9.6%或0.096,属于中等效应。RJW对学生的写作能力和写作动机有显著的同步影响。学生写作部分的相关系数为0.527。大于0.05。RJW对学生的写作能力有部分影响。在动机方面,显著性值为7.488,表明RJW有部分影响。通过等量分析显示了学生的意愿、做某事的欲望、有趣的活动、享受的活动、满意度和面对问题的努力程度。综上所述,RJW对提高或改善学生的写作能力或写作动机都有显著的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信