A Survey of Tool Use in Modeling Education

L. T. W. Agner, T. Lethbridge
{"title":"A Survey of Tool Use in Modeling Education","authors":"L. T. W. Agner, T. Lethbridge","doi":"10.1109/MODELS.2017.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present the results of a survey of tool use in software modeling education conducted from December 2016 to March 2017. The survey was conducted among 150 professors who taught modeling in 30 countries from all regions of the world. Professors reported using 32 modeling tools. Top motivations for choosing tools are simplicity of learning and installing, as well as the tools being free and supporting the most important notations. Top complaints about tools included not interacting with other tools, not supporting sufficient modeling aspects, and being complex to use. Seven of the tools were used by more than one professor as their main tools, and we analyzed these in more depth. Among these 7, lack of feedback about models emerged as another key weakness. The tools varied very considerably regarding which of these strengths and weaknesses they exhibited. The key lessons from the paper are a) that tool developers have many opportunities to improve their products, and b) that educators might benefit from introducing students to multiple different tools.","PeriodicalId":162884,"journal":{"name":"2017 ACM/IEEE 20th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 ACM/IEEE 20th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MODELS.2017.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

We present the results of a survey of tool use in software modeling education conducted from December 2016 to March 2017. The survey was conducted among 150 professors who taught modeling in 30 countries from all regions of the world. Professors reported using 32 modeling tools. Top motivations for choosing tools are simplicity of learning and installing, as well as the tools being free and supporting the most important notations. Top complaints about tools included not interacting with other tools, not supporting sufficient modeling aspects, and being complex to use. Seven of the tools were used by more than one professor as their main tools, and we analyzed these in more depth. Among these 7, lack of feedback about models emerged as another key weakness. The tools varied very considerably regarding which of these strengths and weaknesses they exhibited. The key lessons from the paper are a) that tool developers have many opportunities to improve their products, and b) that educators might benefit from introducing students to multiple different tools.
建模教学中工具使用的调查
我们提出了2016年12月至2017年3月在软件建模教育中进行的工具使用调查的结果。这项调查是在来自世界各地30个国家的150名教授中进行的。教授们报告使用了32种建模工具。选择工具的主要动机是学习和安装的简单性,以及这些工具是免费的,并且支持最重要的符号。对工具的主要抱怨包括不能与其他工具交互,不能支持足够的建模方面,以及使用起来很复杂。其中七个工具被不止一位教授用作主要工具,我们对这些工具进行了更深入的分析。在这7个问题中,缺乏对模型的反馈是另一个关键的弱点。这些工具表现出的优点和缺点差别很大。这篇论文的主要教训是:a)工具开发人员有很多机会改进他们的产品,b)教育工作者可能会从向学生介绍多种不同的工具中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信