An Improved Test for Earnings Management Using Kernel Density Estimation

Henry Lahr
{"title":"An Improved Test for Earnings Management Using Kernel Density Estimation","authors":"Henry Lahr","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1587969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper improves methods developed by Burgstahler and Dichev (1997) and Bollen and Pool (2009) to test for earnings management by identifying discontinuities in distributions of scaled earnings or earnings forecast errors. While existing methods use preselected bandwidths for kernel density estimation and histogram construction, the proposed test procedure addresses the key problem of bandwidth selection by endogenizing the selection step using a bootstrap test. The main advantage offered by the bootstrap test over prior methods is that it provides a reference distribution that cannot be globally distinguished from the empirical distribution instead of assuming a correct reference distribution. This procedure limits the researcher's degrees of freedom and offers a simple procedure to find and test a local discontinuity. I apply the bootstrap density estimation to earnings, earnings changes, and earnings forecast errors in U.S. firms over the period 1976–2010. Significance levels found in earlier studies are greatly reduced, often to insignificant values. Discontinuities cannot be detected in analysts' forecast errors, while such findings of discontinuities in earlier research can be explained by a simple rounding mechanism. Earnings data show a large drop in loss aversion after 2003 that cannot be detected in changes of earnings.","PeriodicalId":355269,"journal":{"name":"CGN: Disclosure & Accounting Decisions (Topic)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CGN: Disclosure & Accounting Decisions (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1587969","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

This paper improves methods developed by Burgstahler and Dichev (1997) and Bollen and Pool (2009) to test for earnings management by identifying discontinuities in distributions of scaled earnings or earnings forecast errors. While existing methods use preselected bandwidths for kernel density estimation and histogram construction, the proposed test procedure addresses the key problem of bandwidth selection by endogenizing the selection step using a bootstrap test. The main advantage offered by the bootstrap test over prior methods is that it provides a reference distribution that cannot be globally distinguished from the empirical distribution instead of assuming a correct reference distribution. This procedure limits the researcher's degrees of freedom and offers a simple procedure to find and test a local discontinuity. I apply the bootstrap density estimation to earnings, earnings changes, and earnings forecast errors in U.S. firms over the period 1976–2010. Significance levels found in earlier studies are greatly reduced, often to insignificant values. Discontinuities cannot be detected in analysts' forecast errors, while such findings of discontinuities in earlier research can be explained by a simple rounding mechanism. Earnings data show a large drop in loss aversion after 2003 that cannot be detected in changes of earnings.
基于核密度估计的盈余管理改进检验
本文改进了Burgstahler和Dichev(1997)以及Bollen和Pool(2009)开发的方法,通过识别规模盈余分布的不连续性或盈余预测误差来检验盈余管理。虽然现有的方法使用预选择的带宽进行核密度估计和直方图构建,但该测试程序通过使用自举测试内生化选择步骤来解决带宽选择的关键问题。与先前的方法相比,自举检验提供的主要优势是它提供了一个不能与经验分布全局区分的参考分布,而不是假设一个正确的参考分布。这个程序限制了研究人员的自由度,并提供了一个简单的程序来发现和测试局部不连续。我将自举密度估计应用于1976-2010年期间美国公司的收益、收益变化和收益预测误差。早期研究中发现的显著性水平大大降低,通常达到不显著的值。在分析师的预测误差中无法检测到不连续性,而早期研究中发现的不连续性可以用简单的舍入机制来解释。收益数据显示,2003年之后的损失厌恶情绪大幅下降,这在收益变化中无法察觉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信