Compensation, Incentives and Organizational Change: Ideas and Evidence from Theory and Practice

Karen H. Wruck
{"title":"Compensation, Incentives and Organizational Change: Ideas and Evidence from Theory and Practice","authors":"Karen H. Wruck","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.203268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Academics and practitioners from a wide range of backgrounds agree that bringing about sustainable, productive changes in organizations is difficult. They disagree, however, on why this is the case. Consequently, they disagree on the most effective approaches to analyzing and solving organizational problems, and on the most effective approaches to implementing solutions. At the heart of the disagreement are differences over the factors that motivate individuals to change their behavior. Behavioral changes on the part of individuals are required for organizational change, and compensation systems affect behavior. Thus, it is critical to consider the role that compensation systems play in the process of organizational change. The paper explains why establishing a strong, positive relation between rewards and performance is critical to bringing about value-creating organizational change. Throughout it draws on ideas and evidence, both old and new, from theory and practice. The ways in which well-designed compensation systems create value in organizations are grouped into four broad categories. Specifically, compensation systems: 1. Improve the motivation and productivity of employees, 2. Promote productive turnover in personnel, 3. Mobilize valuable specific knowledge by allowing effective decentralization, and 4. Help overcome organizational inertia and opposition to change. The paper also analyzes the issue of timing in the implementation of a new compensation system. Conventional wisdom in the field of organizational behavior advocates changing compensation systems only after new \"strategy and structure\" are designed and implemented. In contrast, I provide arguments and evidence in support of changing compensation systems \"early.\" By early, I mean that compensation systems should be redesigned after managers identify and adopt an over-arching objective for the firm, but before they have completely specified how that objective translates into a new strategy and/or structure.","PeriodicalId":142706,"journal":{"name":"Fisher: Dice Center for Financial Economics/Finance (Topic)","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fisher: Dice Center for Financial Economics/Finance (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.203268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

Academics and practitioners from a wide range of backgrounds agree that bringing about sustainable, productive changes in organizations is difficult. They disagree, however, on why this is the case. Consequently, they disagree on the most effective approaches to analyzing and solving organizational problems, and on the most effective approaches to implementing solutions. At the heart of the disagreement are differences over the factors that motivate individuals to change their behavior. Behavioral changes on the part of individuals are required for organizational change, and compensation systems affect behavior. Thus, it is critical to consider the role that compensation systems play in the process of organizational change. The paper explains why establishing a strong, positive relation between rewards and performance is critical to bringing about value-creating organizational change. Throughout it draws on ideas and evidence, both old and new, from theory and practice. The ways in which well-designed compensation systems create value in organizations are grouped into four broad categories. Specifically, compensation systems: 1. Improve the motivation and productivity of employees, 2. Promote productive turnover in personnel, 3. Mobilize valuable specific knowledge by allowing effective decentralization, and 4. Help overcome organizational inertia and opposition to change. The paper also analyzes the issue of timing in the implementation of a new compensation system. Conventional wisdom in the field of organizational behavior advocates changing compensation systems only after new "strategy and structure" are designed and implemented. In contrast, I provide arguments and evidence in support of changing compensation systems "early." By early, I mean that compensation systems should be redesigned after managers identify and adopt an over-arching objective for the firm, but before they have completely specified how that objective translates into a new strategy and/or structure.
薪酬、激励与组织变革:来自理论与实践的观点与证据
来自不同背景的学者和实践者一致认为,在组织中实现可持续的、富有成效的变革是困难的。然而,对于为什么会出现这种情况,他们意见不一。因此,他们在分析和解决组织问题的最有效方法以及实施解决方案的最有效方法上存在分歧。分歧的核心是对激励个人改变其行为的因素的分歧。组织变革需要个人的行为改变,而补偿制度影响个人的行为。因此,考虑薪酬制度在组织变革过程中所起的作用是至关重要的。本文解释了为什么在奖励和绩效之间建立一个强有力的、积极的关系对于实现价值创造的组织变革至关重要。在整个过程中,它从理论和实践中吸取了新的和旧的观点和证据。设计良好的薪酬体系在组织中创造价值的方式可分为四大类。具体来说,薪酬制度:提高员工的积极性和生产力;促进人员的有效流动;通过允许有效的权力下放来调动有价值的具体知识;帮助克服组织惰性和对变革的反对。本文还分析了新薪酬制度实施的时机问题。组织行为学领域的传统观点主张,只有在设计和实施了新的“战略和结构”之后,才能改变薪酬体系。相反,我提供了支持“尽早”改变薪酬制度的论据和证据。我所说的早期,是指在管理者确定并采纳公司的总体目标之后,但在他们完全说明目标如何转化为新的战略和/或结构之前,薪酬体系应该重新设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信