Sales Taxation in Canada: The GST-HST-QST-RST 'System'

R. Bird, Pierre-Pascal Gendron
{"title":"Sales Taxation in Canada: The GST-HST-QST-RST 'System'","authors":"R. Bird, Pierre-Pascal Gendron","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1413333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For decades, the conventional view was that one could not impose a standard invoice-credit destination-based value added tax (VAT) at the subnational level of government. Canada's almost two decades of experience with just such a VAT demonstrates conclusively that this view is incorrect. Not only can it be done, but it has been done, and done well. Canadian experience also demonstrates that a federal VAT can work perfectly well in a country in which some subnational units have their own VATs, some have their own retail sales taxes (RSTs), and some have no sales tax at all. There is no apparent reason a similar system should not work equally well in the United States. In this paper, we discuss in detail the Canadian experience with two quite different types of subnational VATs - the Quebec Sales Tax (QST), a tax imposed on essentially the same base as Canada's federal VAT (the Goods and Services Tax, or GST) but administered by the provincial government, and the Harmonized Sales Tax (HST), essentially a provincial VAT imposed on the same base as the federal GST and administered by the federal government. The existence of these two different forms of provincial VAT raises neither technical nor economic problems for the federal VAT. On the other hand, the existence of a federal VAT has apparently spared Canada from many of the VAT evasion problems to which so much attention has been paid in the European Union, which of course does not have any equivalent 'union-wide' VAT to, as it were, shelter the VATs of member states. The evidence is that those provinces that have altered their sales taxes from RSTs to VATs have suffered no bad consequences and reaped some economic gains, so it is not surprising that Canada's largest province, Ontario, has recently announced that it will join the HST system, with some modifications, in 2010. Other provinces may soon follow. The adoption of a federal VAT in the U.S. might similarly induce states that wish to improve their sales taxes to follow a similar path.","PeriodicalId":132360,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Political Economy: National","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Political Economy: National","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1413333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

For decades, the conventional view was that one could not impose a standard invoice-credit destination-based value added tax (VAT) at the subnational level of government. Canada's almost two decades of experience with just such a VAT demonstrates conclusively that this view is incorrect. Not only can it be done, but it has been done, and done well. Canadian experience also demonstrates that a federal VAT can work perfectly well in a country in which some subnational units have their own VATs, some have their own retail sales taxes (RSTs), and some have no sales tax at all. There is no apparent reason a similar system should not work equally well in the United States. In this paper, we discuss in detail the Canadian experience with two quite different types of subnational VATs - the Quebec Sales Tax (QST), a tax imposed on essentially the same base as Canada's federal VAT (the Goods and Services Tax, or GST) but administered by the provincial government, and the Harmonized Sales Tax (HST), essentially a provincial VAT imposed on the same base as the federal GST and administered by the federal government. The existence of these two different forms of provincial VAT raises neither technical nor economic problems for the federal VAT. On the other hand, the existence of a federal VAT has apparently spared Canada from many of the VAT evasion problems to which so much attention has been paid in the European Union, which of course does not have any equivalent 'union-wide' VAT to, as it were, shelter the VATs of member states. The evidence is that those provinces that have altered their sales taxes from RSTs to VATs have suffered no bad consequences and reaped some economic gains, so it is not surprising that Canada's largest province, Ontario, has recently announced that it will join the HST system, with some modifications, in 2010. Other provinces may soon follow. The adoption of a federal VAT in the U.S. might similarly induce states that wish to improve their sales taxes to follow a similar path.
加拿大的销售税:GST-HST-QST-RST“系统”
几十年来,传统观点认为,不能在地方政府层面征收标准的基于发票-信用目的地的增值税(VAT)。加拿大近20年来征收增值税的经验确凿地证明,这种观点是不正确的。这不仅可以做到,而且已经做到了,而且做得很好。加拿大的经验也表明,联邦增值税在一些地方单位有自己的增值税,一些有自己的零售销售税(rst),一些根本没有销售税的国家可以很好地发挥作用。没有明显的理由表明,类似的制度不应该在美国同样有效。在本文中,我们详细讨论了加拿大在两种完全不同类型的地方增值税方面的经验——魁北克销售税(QST),一种与加拿大联邦增值税(商品和服务税,或GST)基本相同的基础上征收的税,但由省政府管理,以及协调销售税(HST),本质上是一种与联邦GST相同的基础上征收的省级增值税,由联邦政府管理。这两种不同形式的省级增值税的存在既没有给联邦增值税带来技术问题,也没有带来经济问题。另一方面,联邦增值税的存在显然使加拿大免受许多增值税逃税问题的困扰,这些问题在欧盟受到了如此多的关注,欧盟当然没有任何相当于“联盟范围内”的增值税,因为它可以庇护成员国的增值税。有证据表明,那些将销售税从rst改为增值税的省份并没有遭受任何不良后果,而且还获得了一些经济收益,因此,加拿大最大的省份安大略省最近宣布将在2010年加入HST系统,并进行一些修改,也就不足为奇了。其他省份可能很快也会效仿。美国采用联邦增值税可能同样会促使那些希望提高销售税的州采取类似的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信