An Assessment of the Validity of Quasi-Steady Analysis of Pressure Relief Valves

Christopher Doyle, W. Dempster, S. Taggart
{"title":"An Assessment of the Validity of Quasi-Steady Analysis of Pressure Relief Valves","authors":"Christopher Doyle, W. Dempster, S. Taggart","doi":"10.1115/imece2019-10607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this paper, the validity of the commonly used quasi-steady design approach to pressure relief valves (PRV) is examined by comparing detailed steady state conditions of valve behavior directly with transient conditions. To achieve this, a PRV conforming to ASME VIII standards was modelled using the commercial computational fluid dynamics (CFD) package ANSYS FLUENT to account for transient fluid-structure interaction processes. Detailed steady state CFD simulations were conducted using quasi-steady assumptions and compared to high fidelity transient moving mesh simulations to allow the piston forces to be examined. The results indicated that noticeably different magnitudes can occur between steady state and transient simulations; highlighting the possibility of significant differences occurring between quasi steady designed valves and their ultimate performance. In this paper, a single operating condition is examined, using air at 10.3 barg, for a 5231BX refrigeration valve supplied by the Henry Group to highlight the main issues. Analysis has indicated that the differences in performance are generated by temporal, short lived vortices at the piston surface which influences the bulk flow features as the disc accelerates and decelerates; altering the net disc forces when compared to steady state conditions.","PeriodicalId":229616,"journal":{"name":"Volume 7: Fluids Engineering","volume":"110 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 7: Fluids Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2019-10607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, the validity of the commonly used quasi-steady design approach to pressure relief valves (PRV) is examined by comparing detailed steady state conditions of valve behavior directly with transient conditions. To achieve this, a PRV conforming to ASME VIII standards was modelled using the commercial computational fluid dynamics (CFD) package ANSYS FLUENT to account for transient fluid-structure interaction processes. Detailed steady state CFD simulations were conducted using quasi-steady assumptions and compared to high fidelity transient moving mesh simulations to allow the piston forces to be examined. The results indicated that noticeably different magnitudes can occur between steady state and transient simulations; highlighting the possibility of significant differences occurring between quasi steady designed valves and their ultimate performance. In this paper, a single operating condition is examined, using air at 10.3 barg, for a 5231BX refrigeration valve supplied by the Henry Group to highlight the main issues. Analysis has indicated that the differences in performance are generated by temporal, short lived vortices at the piston surface which influences the bulk flow features as the disc accelerates and decelerates; altering the net disc forces when compared to steady state conditions.
溢流阀准稳态分析的有效性评价
本文通过直接比较阀的详细稳态条件和瞬态条件,验证了常用的准稳态设计方法对减压阀的有效性。为了实现这一目标,使用商业计算流体动力学(CFD)软件包ANSYS FLUENT对符合ASME VIII标准的PRV进行建模,以考虑瞬态流固耦合过程。采用准稳态假设进行了详细的稳态CFD模拟,并与高保真的瞬态运动网格模拟进行了比较,以检验活塞的受力情况。结果表明,稳态模拟与瞬态模拟之间存在明显的震级差异;强调在准稳定设计的阀门和它们的最终性能之间发生显著差异的可能性。本文以亨利集团提供的5231BX制冷阀为例,对其使用10.3巴压空气的单一工况进行了研究,以突出主要问题。分析表明,性能的差异是由活塞表面的时间、短寿命涡引起的,当圆盘加速和减速时,它会影响整体流动特性;与稳态条件相比,改变净阀瓣力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信