{"title":"Performance, Politics, and Historiography in and out of Time: American Responses to the Paris Commune","authors":"Loren Kruger","doi":"10.36744/pt.983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"American echoes of the Paris Commune have been muffled by the nation’s obsession with freedom at the expense of solidarity, but performative responses to social upheaval, including drama, parades, and protests, have tested the boundaries of public space and multiple temporalities from 1871 to 2021. This article notes traces of the Commune in the writings and performances of nineteenth century American anarchists but analyzes this legacy primarily in the 2012 performance of Brecht’s The Days of the Commune (1949) at New York sites claimed by the Occupy Movement in 2011. It also uses the argument of Brecht’s contemporary Ernst Bloch for cultural action grounded in an understanding of historical disappointment to anticipates setbacks while maintaining hope for future revolution. The paper delineates five theses on the politics of time: 1) the dramatic appeal of the clean break hides the tension between gradual evolution and a sudden event that ruptures the long span of history (Badiou); 2) historiography, the narrative that turns data into evidence, challenges the illusion of objectivity and thus a simple split between timely intervention and untimely interference with the established order (Nietzsche); 3) ana-chronology, the logic of untimeliness reads contemporaneity as companionship between events and agents across different times and places (Barthes); 4) recollecting history requires acts of forgetting, which shatter the constraints of the past to meet demands of the present (Renan, Nietzsche); 5) the politics of time entails the politics of place and thus requires the analysis of multiple temporalitieslayered on one site as well as political acts and performance in distinct places.","PeriodicalId":206887,"journal":{"name":"Pamiętnik Teatralny","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pamiętnik Teatralny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36744/pt.983","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
American echoes of the Paris Commune have been muffled by the nation’s obsession with freedom at the expense of solidarity, but performative responses to social upheaval, including drama, parades, and protests, have tested the boundaries of public space and multiple temporalities from 1871 to 2021. This article notes traces of the Commune in the writings and performances of nineteenth century American anarchists but analyzes this legacy primarily in the 2012 performance of Brecht’s The Days of the Commune (1949) at New York sites claimed by the Occupy Movement in 2011. It also uses the argument of Brecht’s contemporary Ernst Bloch for cultural action grounded in an understanding of historical disappointment to anticipates setbacks while maintaining hope for future revolution. The paper delineates five theses on the politics of time: 1) the dramatic appeal of the clean break hides the tension between gradual evolution and a sudden event that ruptures the long span of history (Badiou); 2) historiography, the narrative that turns data into evidence, challenges the illusion of objectivity and thus a simple split between timely intervention and untimely interference with the established order (Nietzsche); 3) ana-chronology, the logic of untimeliness reads contemporaneity as companionship between events and agents across different times and places (Barthes); 4) recollecting history requires acts of forgetting, which shatter the constraints of the past to meet demands of the present (Renan, Nietzsche); 5) the politics of time entails the politics of place and thus requires the analysis of multiple temporalitieslayered on one site as well as political acts and performance in distinct places.
美国对巴黎公社的呼应被这个国家以牺牲团结为代价的对自由的痴迷所掩盖,但对社会动荡的表演回应,包括戏剧、游行和抗议,从1871年到2021年,已经考验了公共空间和多重时间性的界限。本文在19世纪美国无政府主义者的作品和表演中注意到公社的痕迹,但主要是在2012年布莱希特(Brecht)的《公社的日子》(the Days of the Commune, 1949)在2011年占领运动占领的纽约地点的表演中分析这一遗产。它还使用了布莱希特同时代的恩斯特·布洛赫(Ernst Bloch)的观点,认为文化行动基于对历史失望的理解,在对未来革命保持希望的同时,可以预见挫折。本文阐述了时间政治的五个论点:1)彻底决裂的戏剧性吸引力掩盖了渐进演变与打破漫长历史跨度的突发事件之间的张力(巴迪欧);2)史学,将数据转化为证据的叙述,挑战客观性的幻觉,从而在及时干预和不合时宜地干预既定秩序之间形成简单的分裂(尼采);3)逆年代学,非时效性的逻辑将当代性解读为不同时间和地点的事件和行动者之间的伙伴关系(巴特);4)回忆历史需要遗忘的行为,这打破了过去的限制,以满足现在的要求(勒南,尼采);5)时间的政治包含了地点的政治,因此需要对一个地点的多重时间性以及不同地点的政治行为和表现进行分析。