Statements of the Chinese Government before Human Rights Treaty Bodies: Doctrine and Practice of Treaty Implementation

Björn Ahl
{"title":"Statements of the Chinese Government before Human Rights Treaty Bodies: Doctrine and Practice of Treaty Implementation","authors":"Björn Ahl","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2830402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the implementation of human rights treaties in China on the basis of statements that were made by the PRC government before human rights treaty bodies. The analysis of government statements differentiates between statements representing an 'internationalist' position and those standing for a 'realist' approach. The study reveals the inconsistencies and incoherencies of the position on international human rights law as presented by the official statements before international treaty bodies. It also explains the gradual change from the internationalist to the realist position by introducing relevant Chinese academic discourses and presenting the political and philosophical underpinnings of official statements and scholarly commentary. Although human rights treaties become part of the national legal system, courts do not apply human rights treaties directly. International human rights obligations are only implemented by way of specific legislative acts.","PeriodicalId":434324,"journal":{"name":"The Australian Journal of Asian Law","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Australian Journal of Asian Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2830402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This article explores the implementation of human rights treaties in China on the basis of statements that were made by the PRC government before human rights treaty bodies. The analysis of government statements differentiates between statements representing an 'internationalist' position and those standing for a 'realist' approach. The study reveals the inconsistencies and incoherencies of the position on international human rights law as presented by the official statements before international treaty bodies. It also explains the gradual change from the internationalist to the realist position by introducing relevant Chinese academic discourses and presenting the political and philosophical underpinnings of official statements and scholarly commentary. Although human rights treaties become part of the national legal system, courts do not apply human rights treaties directly. International human rights obligations are only implemented by way of specific legislative acts.
中国政府在人权条约机构的发言:条约履约的理论与实践
本文以中国政府在人权条约机构的发言为基础,探讨中国人权条约的执行情况。对政府声明的分析区分了代表“国际主义”立场的声明和代表“现实主义”立场的声明。这项研究揭示了在国际条约机构面前所作的正式发言所表明的关于国际人权法的立场的不一致和不连贯。通过介绍相关的中国学术话语,并呈现官方声明和学术评论的政治和哲学基础,解释了从国际主义到现实主义立场的逐渐转变。虽然人权条约已成为国家法律体系的一部分,但法院并不直接适用人权条约。国际人权义务只能通过具体的立法行为来履行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信