Evaluation of EMD and SSA sensitivity for efficient detection of aerodynamic instabilities in centrifugal compressors

M. Stajuda, D. Cava, G. Liśkiewicz
{"title":"Evaluation of EMD and SSA sensitivity for efficient detection of aerodynamic instabilities in centrifugal compressors","authors":"M. Stajuda, D. Cava, G. Liśkiewicz","doi":"10.1109/spsympo51155.2020.9593801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aerodynamic instabilities in centrifugal compressors are dangerous phenomena affecting machines efficiency and in severe cases leading to failures of the compressing system due to high amplitude vibrations. Efficient instabilities detection during compressor operation is a challenge of utmost importance from economical and safety point of view. The most sensitive detection is possible with use of a pressure signal from inside of the compressor because specific pressure patterns are the first symptoms of instabilities. Detection of aerodynamic instabilities results in specific challenges, as the pressure signal is often very noisy and contains high amount of randomness. Surge - most severe instability, can develop very quickly. Therefore, the method of detection should be sensitive but also robust and quick. Another common instability, inlet recirculation is less dangerous, but it results in decrease of efficiency, which is to be avoided. Inlet recirculation often happens before surge, thus its presence can be used for surge proximity detection. The aim of this study is to investigate and compare the performance of two non-linear processing methods - Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD) and Singular Spectrum Analysis (SSA) in the context of aerodynamic instabilities detection - inlet recirculation and surge. The comparison focuses on the robustness, sensitivity and pace of detection - crucial parameters for a successful detection method. It is shown that both methods perform similarly within the analyzed bounds for both instabilities. A slight advantage of SSA may be noticed for surge due to lower dispersion of the indicator value for the same conditions.","PeriodicalId":380515,"journal":{"name":"2021 Signal Processing Symposium (SPSympo)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 Signal Processing Symposium (SPSympo)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/spsympo51155.2020.9593801","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aerodynamic instabilities in centrifugal compressors are dangerous phenomena affecting machines efficiency and in severe cases leading to failures of the compressing system due to high amplitude vibrations. Efficient instabilities detection during compressor operation is a challenge of utmost importance from economical and safety point of view. The most sensitive detection is possible with use of a pressure signal from inside of the compressor because specific pressure patterns are the first symptoms of instabilities. Detection of aerodynamic instabilities results in specific challenges, as the pressure signal is often very noisy and contains high amount of randomness. Surge - most severe instability, can develop very quickly. Therefore, the method of detection should be sensitive but also robust and quick. Another common instability, inlet recirculation is less dangerous, but it results in decrease of efficiency, which is to be avoided. Inlet recirculation often happens before surge, thus its presence can be used for surge proximity detection. The aim of this study is to investigate and compare the performance of two non-linear processing methods - Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD) and Singular Spectrum Analysis (SSA) in the context of aerodynamic instabilities detection - inlet recirculation and surge. The comparison focuses on the robustness, sensitivity and pace of detection - crucial parameters for a successful detection method. It is shown that both methods perform similarly within the analyzed bounds for both instabilities. A slight advantage of SSA may be noticed for surge due to lower dispersion of the indicator value for the same conditions.
离心式压缩机气动不稳定性有效检测的EMD和SSA灵敏度评价
离心式压缩机的气动不稳定性是一种影响机器效率的危险现象,严重时由于振动的高振幅会导致压缩系统的故障。从经济和安全的角度来看,压缩机运行过程中有效的不稳定性检测是一个至关重要的挑战。最灵敏的检测可能是使用来自压缩机内部的压力信号,因为特定的压力模式是不稳定的第一个症状。空气动力学不稳定性的检测带来了特殊的挑战,因为压力信号通常非常嘈杂,并且包含大量的随机性。浪涌-最严重的不稳定,可以发展得非常快。因此,检测方法既要灵敏,又要鲁棒、快速。另一种常见的不稳定性是进口再循环,它危险性较小,但会导致效率下降,这是应该避免的。入口再循环通常发生在喘振之前,因此它的存在可以用于喘振接近检测。本研究的目的是研究和比较两种非线性处理方法-经验模态分解(EMD)和奇异谱分析(SSA)在空气动力不稳定性检测-进气道再循环和喘振背景下的性能。比较的重点是鲁棒性,灵敏度和检测速度-一个成功的检测方法的关键参数。结果表明,两种方法在两种不稳定性的分析范围内表现相似。由于相同条件下指标值的分散性较低,因此可能会注意到SSA对浪涌的轻微优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信