Metodologías didácticas activas frente a paradigma tradicional. Una revisión sistemática

Fanny LÓPEZ-ALEGRÍA, Claudia Fraile, Mgter. Fanny López, Libertador Bernardo, O’Higgins n
{"title":"Metodologías didácticas activas frente a paradigma tradicional. Una revisión sistemática","authors":"Fanny LÓPEZ-ALEGRÍA, Claudia Fraile, Mgter. Fanny López, Libertador Bernardo, O’Higgins n","doi":"10.33588/fem.261.1255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"‘high fidelity simulation training’ OR ‘simulation Training’ OR ‘problem based learning’ OR ‘inverted classroom’ OR ‘flipped classroom’ AND ‘traditional classroom’ AND learning OR ‘Kolb´s learning’ OR ‘Kirkpatrick model’ OR ‘soft skills test’. Results. Of the 1,085 records identified, 11 articles were included for analysis. In these articles, when comparing the traditional classroom with the active participatory methodologies, the latter obtained better results in the learning variables, confidence in the acquisition of learning, critical thinking and skills, but there was no statistical significance in most of the studies. Conclusions. No statistically significant differences were found in student learning between the use of active learning methodologies and the traditional paradigm.","PeriodicalId":131160,"journal":{"name":"Revista de la Fundación Educación Médica","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de la Fundación Educación Médica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33588/fem.261.1255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

‘high fidelity simulation training’ OR ‘simulation Training’ OR ‘problem based learning’ OR ‘inverted classroom’ OR ‘flipped classroom’ AND ‘traditional classroom’ AND learning OR ‘Kolb´s learning’ OR ‘Kirkpatrick model’ OR ‘soft skills test’. Results. Of the 1,085 records identified, 11 articles were included for analysis. In these articles, when comparing the traditional classroom with the active participatory methodologies, the latter obtained better results in the learning variables, confidence in the acquisition of learning, critical thinking and skills, but there was no statistical significance in most of the studies. Conclusions. No statistically significant differences were found in student learning between the use of active learning methodologies and the traditional paradigm.
主动教学方法与传统范式的对比。系统回顾
“高保真模拟训练”或“模拟训练”或“基于问题的学习”或“颠倒课堂”或“翻转课堂”和“传统课堂”和学习或“科尔布学习”或“柯克帕特里克模型”或“软技能测试”。结果。在确定的1085条记录中,有11篇文章被纳入分析。在这些文章中,将传统课堂与主动参与式课堂进行比较,后者在学习变量、习得信心、批判性思维和技能方面取得了更好的效果,但大多数研究没有统计学意义。结论。使用主动学习方法和传统学习模式在学生学习方面没有统计学上的显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信