Comparative study on brightness and leakage ratio test methods of optical waveguide augmented reality glasses

Fei Di, Yingying Xu, Chi Chen, Jinjun Wu
{"title":"Comparative study on brightness and leakage ratio test methods of optical waveguide augmented reality glasses","authors":"Fei Di, Yingying Xu, Chi Chen, Jinjun Wu","doi":"10.1117/12.2667900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Because the near eye display (NED) device mainly displays its imaging effect with a unique virtual image, in essence, compared with the traditional display device, the measurement requirements and methods of brightness, light leakage ratio and other related parameters have also changed. By analyzing the imaging characteristics of optical waveguide AR display equipment, a comparative test scheme for brightness and light leakage ratio is proposed. The same type of arrayed optical waveguide NED module is experimentally measured by using equipment with different test principles, and the measurement results are compared and analyzed. The research results show that the measurement results of the ordinary aiming point luminance meter are not the luminance values in the real display. For the measurement of a certain illumination degree of the equipment, the luminance value and light leakage measured by the aiming point luminance meter have lower deviation than that measured by the two-dimensional imaging luminance meter. Therefore, in the process of testing NED, it is necessary to correctly select the measuring instrument according to its imaging characteristics, the size of the area to be tested and the test scene.","PeriodicalId":227067,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Precision Instruments and Optical Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Precision Instruments and Optical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2667900","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Because the near eye display (NED) device mainly displays its imaging effect with a unique virtual image, in essence, compared with the traditional display device, the measurement requirements and methods of brightness, light leakage ratio and other related parameters have also changed. By analyzing the imaging characteristics of optical waveguide AR display equipment, a comparative test scheme for brightness and light leakage ratio is proposed. The same type of arrayed optical waveguide NED module is experimentally measured by using equipment with different test principles, and the measurement results are compared and analyzed. The research results show that the measurement results of the ordinary aiming point luminance meter are not the luminance values in the real display. For the measurement of a certain illumination degree of the equipment, the luminance value and light leakage measured by the aiming point luminance meter have lower deviation than that measured by the two-dimensional imaging luminance meter. Therefore, in the process of testing NED, it is necessary to correctly select the measuring instrument according to its imaging characteristics, the size of the area to be tested and the test scene.
光波导增强现实眼镜亮度和漏率测试方法的比较研究
由于近眼显示(NED)设备主要以独特的虚拟图像显示其成像效果,本质上,与传统显示设备相比,亮度、漏光比等相关参数的测量要求和方法也发生了变化。通过对光波导AR显示设备成像特性的分析,提出了光波导AR显示设备亮度和漏光比的对比测试方案。采用不同测试原理的设备对同一类型的阵列光波导NED模块进行了实验测量,并对测量结果进行了比较分析。研究结果表明,普通瞄准点亮度计的测量结果与实际显示的亮度值不符。对于设备一定照度的测量,瞄准点亮度计测得的亮度值和漏光量比二维成像亮度计测得的偏差更小。因此,在测试NED的过程中,需要根据其成像特性、待测区域的大小和测试场景,正确选择测量仪器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信