STATE AND FEATURES OF E-GOVERNMENT DEVELOPMENT IN THE WORLD

Yu. H. Bocharova, O. Chernega, T. Kozhukhova, O. Ishchenko
{"title":"STATE AND FEATURES OF E-GOVERNMENT DEVELOPMENT IN THE WORLD","authors":"Yu. H. Bocharova, O. Chernega, T. Kozhukhova, O. Ishchenko","doi":"10.33274/2079-4819-2022-76-1-70-80","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. The objective of the article is the analysis of the state and features of e-government development in the world in 2010-2020.\n\nMethods. The following methods and techniques of cognition are used in the research process: theoretical generalization and comparison, analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, grouping.\n\nResults. According to the results of the study, it is substantiated that the most representative and authoritative among the indicators that allow to assess the level of development of e-government is the indicator of EGDI; this indicator is calculated on the basis of three complex indicators: the volume and quality of online services, the development of online services (OSI), the state of development of telecommunications infrastructure (TII), human capital (HCI); the EGDI value varies from 0 to 1, where 0 is the minimum value, and 1 is the maximum one. Countries of the world are differentiated according to the value of EGDI into four groups: countries with a very high and high level of e-government development, countries with medium and low level of e-government development. It is established that in 2010-2020: the level of development of e-government in the world increased (if in 2010 the average EGDI in the world was 0,45, in 2020 it was 0,6); there were significant country and macro-regional asymmetries and disparities in the development of e-government. It is substantiated that the undisputed leader among macro-regions in terms of development and speed of transformations aimed at the development of e-government was Europe, the outsider was Africa; the most significant success in the development of e-government in the world was achieved in ensuring the development of human capital, the least — in ensuring the development of telecommunications infrastructure, although the most dynamic transformations in macro-regions were in this direction. Among the countries with the greatest success in the development of e-government were Denmark, the Republic of Korea, Australia, the United Kingdom, the United States and the Netherlands; the smallest — Eritrea, CAR, Chad, Niger, Guinea-Bissau.","PeriodicalId":315409,"journal":{"name":"Visnyk of Donetsk National University of Economics and Trade named after Mykhailo Tugan-Baranovsky","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visnyk of Donetsk National University of Economics and Trade named after Mykhailo Tugan-Baranovsky","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33274/2079-4819-2022-76-1-70-80","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective. The objective of the article is the analysis of the state and features of e-government development in the world in 2010-2020. Methods. The following methods and techniques of cognition are used in the research process: theoretical generalization and comparison, analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, grouping. Results. According to the results of the study, it is substantiated that the most representative and authoritative among the indicators that allow to assess the level of development of e-government is the indicator of EGDI; this indicator is calculated on the basis of three complex indicators: the volume and quality of online services, the development of online services (OSI), the state of development of telecommunications infrastructure (TII), human capital (HCI); the EGDI value varies from 0 to 1, where 0 is the minimum value, and 1 is the maximum one. Countries of the world are differentiated according to the value of EGDI into four groups: countries with a very high and high level of e-government development, countries with medium and low level of e-government development. It is established that in 2010-2020: the level of development of e-government in the world increased (if in 2010 the average EGDI in the world was 0,45, in 2020 it was 0,6); there were significant country and macro-regional asymmetries and disparities in the development of e-government. It is substantiated that the undisputed leader among macro-regions in terms of development and speed of transformations aimed at the development of e-government was Europe, the outsider was Africa; the most significant success in the development of e-government in the world was achieved in ensuring the development of human capital, the least — in ensuring the development of telecommunications infrastructure, although the most dynamic transformations in macro-regions were in this direction. Among the countries with the greatest success in the development of e-government were Denmark, the Republic of Korea, Australia, the United Kingdom, the United States and the Netherlands; the smallest — Eritrea, CAR, Chad, Niger, Guinea-Bissau.
世界各国电子政务发展的现状和特点
目标。本文的目的是分析2010-2020年世界电子政务发展的现状和特点。在研究过程中运用了以下几种认知方法和技术:理论概括与比较、分析与综合、归纳与演绎、分组、结果。研究结果表明,在评价电子政务发展水平的指标中,最具代表性和权威性的是电子政务发展指数;该指标是根据三个复杂指标计算得出的:在线服务的数量和质量、在线服务的发展(OSI)、电信基础设施的发展状况(TII)、人力资本(HCI);EGDI取值范围为0 ~ 1,其中0为最小值,1为最大值。根据电子政务发展指数的价值,将世界各国划分为电子政务发展水平极高和较高的国家、电子政务发展水平中等和较低的国家四类。结果表明:2010-2020年,全球电子政务发展水平提高(若2010年全球平均电子政务发展指数为0.45,2020年全球电子政务发展指数为0.6);电子政务的发展存在着显著的国家和宏观区域不对称性和差异。实证结果表明,在宏观区域中,欧洲在电子政务发展的发展和转型速度方面处于无可争议的领先地位,非洲处于局外人;世界上电子政务发展中最显著的成功是在确保人力资本的发展方面取得的,最不显著的成功是在确保电信基础设施的发展方面取得的,尽管宏观地区最具活力的变革是在这个方向上取得的。在电子政务发展方面取得最大成功的国家有丹麦、韩国、澳大利亚、英国、美国和荷兰;最小的是厄立特里亚、中非共和国、乍得、尼日尔、几内亚比绍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信