Guilt, Resentment, and Post-Holocaust Democracy: The Frankfurt School's Analysis of "Secondary Antisemitism" in the Group Experiment and Beyond

L. Rensmann
{"title":"Guilt, Resentment, and Post-Holocaust Democracy: The Frankfurt School's Analysis of \"Secondary Antisemitism\" in the Group Experiment and Beyond","authors":"L. Rensmann","doi":"10.2979/ANTISTUD.1.1.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Previous discussions of the Frankfurt School's work on Judeophobia have almost entirely neglected the Critical Theorists' pathbreaking analysis of \"secondary antisemitism\" after Auschwitz. This new form of Jew-hatred originates in the political and psychological desire to split off, repress, and downplay the memory of the Holocaust because such memory, with which Jews are often identified, evokes unwelcome guilt feelings. As Holocaust memory undermines the uncritical identification with a collective, family, or nation tainted by anti-Jewish mass atrocities, the repression of national guilt may unconsciously motivate the reproduction of resentments that helped cause the Shoah. In this light, the article re-examines the empirical postwar German study Group Experiment and other works of the Frankfurt School. Three specific defensive mechanisms in relation to historical collective guilt feelings are identified that engender a variety of antisemitic projections—from the \"Jewish power\" to \"Jewish money\" and other anti-Jewish tropes—after the Holocaust. It is argued that these insights into post-Holocaust secondary antisemitism, empirically analyzed in the German context, can partly be transferred to other contexts in European democracies and beyond. This article demonstrates that an unprocessed history of national guilt can have a negative impact on democracy and the resilience of antisemitism.","PeriodicalId":148002,"journal":{"name":"Antisemitism Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antisemitism Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/ANTISTUD.1.1.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract:Previous discussions of the Frankfurt School's work on Judeophobia have almost entirely neglected the Critical Theorists' pathbreaking analysis of "secondary antisemitism" after Auschwitz. This new form of Jew-hatred originates in the political and psychological desire to split off, repress, and downplay the memory of the Holocaust because such memory, with which Jews are often identified, evokes unwelcome guilt feelings. As Holocaust memory undermines the uncritical identification with a collective, family, or nation tainted by anti-Jewish mass atrocities, the repression of national guilt may unconsciously motivate the reproduction of resentments that helped cause the Shoah. In this light, the article re-examines the empirical postwar German study Group Experiment and other works of the Frankfurt School. Three specific defensive mechanisms in relation to historical collective guilt feelings are identified that engender a variety of antisemitic projections—from the "Jewish power" to "Jewish money" and other anti-Jewish tropes—after the Holocaust. It is argued that these insights into post-Holocaust secondary antisemitism, empirically analyzed in the German context, can partly be transferred to other contexts in European democracies and beyond. This article demonstrates that an unprocessed history of national guilt can have a negative impact on democracy and the resilience of antisemitism.
内疚、怨恨和大屠杀后的民主:法兰克福学派对《群体实验及以后》中“次要反犹主义”的分析
摘要:以往关于法兰克福学派犹太恐惧症研究的讨论,几乎完全忽略了批判理论家对奥斯威辛之后“二次反犹主义”的开创性分析。这种新形式的对犹太人的仇恨源于分裂、压制和淡化大屠杀记忆的政治和心理欲望,因为这样的记忆往往会让犹太人产生不受欢迎的内疚感。由于大屠杀记忆破坏了对被反犹太人大规模暴行玷污的集体、家庭或国家的不加批判的认同,对民族内疚的压制可能会无意识地激发导致大屠杀的怨恨的再现。有鉴于此,本文重新审视了战后德国实证研究小组实验和法兰克福学派的其他著作。三种特定的防御机制与历史上的集体内疚感有关,这些机制在大屠杀之后产生了各种反犹主义的投射——从“犹太人的力量”到“犹太人的钱”和其他反犹主义的比喻。作者认为,在德国背景下对大屠杀后二级反犹主义进行的实证分析,可以部分地转移到欧洲民主国家及其他地区的其他背景中。这篇文章表明,未经处理的民族内疚历史可能对民主和反犹主义的弹性产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信