Effect of Control Mode and Test Rate on the Measured Fracture Toughness of Advanced Ceramics

Bronson D. Hausmann, J. Salem
{"title":"Effect of Control Mode and Test Rate on the Measured Fracture Toughness of Advanced Ceramics","authors":"Bronson D. Hausmann, J. Salem","doi":"10.1002/9781119543343.CH4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The effects of control mode and test rate on the measured fracture toughness of ceramics were evaluated by using chevron-notched flexure specimens in accordance with ASTM C1421. The use of stroke control gave consistent results with about 2% (statistically insignificant) variation in measured fracture toughness for a very wide range of rates (0.005 to 0.5 mm/min). Use of strain or crack mouth opening displacement (CMOD) control gave ~5% (statistically significant) variation over a very wide range of rates (1 to 80 µm/m/s), with the measurements being a function of rate. However, the rate effect was eliminated by use of dry nitrogen, implying a stress corrosion effect rather than a stability effect. With the use of a nitrogen environment during strain controlled tests, fracture toughness values were within about 1% over a wide range of rates (1 to 80 µm/m/s). CMOD or strain control did allow stable crack extension well past maximum force, and thus is preferred for energy calculations. The effort is being used to confirm recommendations in ASTM Test Method C1421 on fracture toughness measurement.","PeriodicalId":206107,"journal":{"name":"Proceeding of the 42nd International Conference on Advanced Ceramics and Composites","volume":"114 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceeding of the 42nd International Conference on Advanced Ceramics and Composites","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119543343.CH4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effects of control mode and test rate on the measured fracture toughness of ceramics were evaluated by using chevron-notched flexure specimens in accordance with ASTM C1421. The use of stroke control gave consistent results with about 2% (statistically insignificant) variation in measured fracture toughness for a very wide range of rates (0.005 to 0.5 mm/min). Use of strain or crack mouth opening displacement (CMOD) control gave ~5% (statistically significant) variation over a very wide range of rates (1 to 80 µm/m/s), with the measurements being a function of rate. However, the rate effect was eliminated by use of dry nitrogen, implying a stress corrosion effect rather than a stability effect. With the use of a nitrogen environment during strain controlled tests, fracture toughness values were within about 1% over a wide range of rates (1 to 80 µm/m/s). CMOD or strain control did allow stable crack extension well past maximum force, and thus is preferred for energy calculations. The effort is being used to confirm recommendations in ASTM Test Method C1421 on fracture toughness measurement.
控制方式和测试速率对高级陶瓷断裂韧性测量的影响
根据ASTM C1421标准,采用锯齿形缺口弯曲试样,评价了控制方式和测试速率对陶瓷断裂韧性的影响。在非常宽的速率范围内(0.005至0.5 mm/min),冲程控制的使用提供了一致的结果,测量的断裂韧性变化约为2%(统计上不显著)。使用应变或裂纹开口位移(CMOD)控制,在非常宽的速率范围内(1至80 μ m/m/s)有~5%(统计上显著)的变化,测量结果是速率的函数。然而,使用干氮消除了速率效应,这意味着应力腐蚀效应而不是稳定性效应。在应变控制测试中,在氮气环境下,在较宽的速率范围内(1至80 μ m/m/s),断裂韧性值在1%左右。CMOD或应变控制确实允许稳定的裂纹扩展超过最大力,因此首选用于能量计算。这项工作正在用于确认ASTM测试方法C1421中关于断裂韧性测量的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信