Theological and Anthropological Foundations of Religious Learning: A Commentary

{"title":"Theological and Anthropological Foundations of Religious Learning: A Commentary","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9783110752410-005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a commentary on the panel ‘Theological and Anthropological Foundations of Religious Learning’ of the conference ‘Aufbruch zu neuen Ufern’ (Setting off for New Shores), the focus of the present contribution is on the theological and religious education challenges addressed in the panel.1 These challenges can be identified in the academic engagement with Islamic theology and religious education in the European context. The question of the Islamic self-understanding is fundamental in the context of heterogenous societies and pluralist academic discourse in Europe. This question includes many areas and facets and still needs extensive analysis. This is why this commentary can only be a fragmentary representation of this highly complex problem that is only beginning to be explored. Therefore, the ideas that will be worked out here are not to be understood as approaches ready to be implemented but as foundations for discussion. In general, the panel displayed a certain scepticism regarding the focusing of Islamic theology and religious education on the Christian-secular European context. This contextuality leads not only to contempt for the classical Islamic tradition (which in any case includes everything) but also to a watering down of what constitutes genuine Islamic content. This scepticism, which stamped the whole panel discussion on the establishment of Islamic theology and religious education, also constitutes the central focus of the ideas to be explored here.","PeriodicalId":188523,"journal":{"name":"Rethinking Islam in Europe","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rethinking Islam in Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110752410-005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As a commentary on the panel ‘Theological and Anthropological Foundations of Religious Learning’ of the conference ‘Aufbruch zu neuen Ufern’ (Setting off for New Shores), the focus of the present contribution is on the theological and religious education challenges addressed in the panel.1 These challenges can be identified in the academic engagement with Islamic theology and religious education in the European context. The question of the Islamic self-understanding is fundamental in the context of heterogenous societies and pluralist academic discourse in Europe. This question includes many areas and facets and still needs extensive analysis. This is why this commentary can only be a fragmentary representation of this highly complex problem that is only beginning to be explored. Therefore, the ideas that will be worked out here are not to be understood as approaches ready to be implemented but as foundations for discussion. In general, the panel displayed a certain scepticism regarding the focusing of Islamic theology and religious education on the Christian-secular European context. This contextuality leads not only to contempt for the classical Islamic tradition (which in any case includes everything) but also to a watering down of what constitutes genuine Islamic content. This scepticism, which stamped the whole panel discussion on the establishment of Islamic theology and religious education, also constitutes the central focus of the ideas to be explored here.
宗教学习的神学和人类学基础:评注
作为对“Aufbruch zu neuen Ufern”(出发前往新海岸)会议“宗教学习的神学和人类学基础”小组的评论,目前的贡献集中在小组讨论的神学和宗教教育挑战上这些挑战可以在欧洲背景下与伊斯兰神学和宗教教育的学术接触中发现。伊斯兰的自我理解问题在欧洲异质社会和多元学术话语的背景下是根本的。这个问题包括许多领域和方面,还需要广泛的分析。这就是为什么这篇评论只能是对这个高度复杂的问题的一个零碎的描述,而这个问题才刚刚开始被探索。因此,将在这里提出的想法不应被理解为准备实施的方法,而应被理解为讨论的基础。总的来说,小组对将伊斯兰神学和宗教教育的重点放在基督教-世俗的欧洲背景下表现出一定的怀疑。这种语境性不仅导致了对古典伊斯兰传统(无论如何包括一切)的蔑视,也导致了对真正伊斯兰内容的淡化。这种怀疑主义贯穿了整个关于伊斯兰神学和宗教教育建立的小组讨论,也构成了这里要探讨的思想的中心焦点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信