The comparison of pixel size and atmospheric correction method on matched filter detection for a hyperspectral image

P. Conforti, R. Sundberg
{"title":"The comparison of pixel size and atmospheric correction method on matched filter detection for a hyperspectral image","authors":"P. Conforti, R. Sundberg","doi":"10.1109/WHISPERS.2009.5289000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two atmospheric correction methods are used to obtain the reflectance for a hyperspectral data image resampled to varying spatial resolution. The physics-based FLAASH approach as well as the in-scene based QUAC method retrieve the reflectance spectra for the scene, and the ability to use the results to detect materials of interest in the image is determined. Using a spectral matched filter to score the results, both FLAASH and QUAC perform well at matching the ground truth spectrum of a bright meter-sized material at ground sampling distances of 2.4–24 m. For a dark material, QUAC performance degrades with lower resolutions.","PeriodicalId":242447,"journal":{"name":"2009 First Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 First Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WHISPERS.2009.5289000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Two atmospheric correction methods are used to obtain the reflectance for a hyperspectral data image resampled to varying spatial resolution. The physics-based FLAASH approach as well as the in-scene based QUAC method retrieve the reflectance spectra for the scene, and the ability to use the results to detect materials of interest in the image is determined. Using a spectral matched filter to score the results, both FLAASH and QUAC perform well at matching the ground truth spectrum of a bright meter-sized material at ground sampling distances of 2.4–24 m. For a dark material, QUAC performance degrades with lower resolutions.
高光谱图像匹配滤波检测中像元大小与大气校正方法的比较
采用两种大气校正方法对不同空间分辨率的高光谱数据图像进行了重采样,得到了反射率。基于物理的FLAASH方法以及基于场景的QUAC方法检索场景的反射光谱,并确定使用结果检测图像中感兴趣的材料的能力。使用光谱匹配滤波器对结果进行评分,FLAASH和QUAC在2.4-24 m的地面采样距离上都能很好地匹配明亮的米大小物质的地面真值光谱。对于深色材料,QUAC性能随着分辨率的降低而下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信