Consumers’ Mortgage Loan Complaints and Boom and Bust in the Mortgage Market 2001-2008

Daniel E. Nolle
{"title":"Consumers’ Mortgage Loan Complaints and Boom and Bust in the Mortgage Market 2001-2008","authors":"Daniel E. Nolle","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1987196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The historic boom and subsequent, on-going bust in the U.S. residential mortgage market over the past decade have been periods of revolutionary change in consumer credit access. In particular, the burgeoning subprime mortgage market intertwined with the explosive growth of nontraditional mortgages increased not only the number of households to whom mortgage credit was extended, but also the array of mortgage products available to them. Currently, record numbers of households face foreclosure, and mortgage loan delinquency rates continue to climb. Related to these disturbing trends are widespread observations that a significant number of households have not fully understood the terms of the mortgage contracts to which they committed, especially as from the peak of the subprime lending boom in late 2005 and early 2006. Research on consumers’, lenders’, and regulators’ behaviors over the ongoing turmoil in the mortgage market has addressed a range of issues, including the benefits and pitfalls of recent innovations in mortgage finance, the shifting roles of bank versus nonbank lenders and servicers, federal-level and state-level supervision of mortgage market participants, and predatory lending. One aspect of mortgage activity receiving very little systematic analysis is the nature of consumers’ complaints about both the mortgage origination and the servicing processes. In view of widespread belief about exploitative and abusive practices in the residential mortgage industry, quantitative information about borrower complaints could improve policy makers’ grasp of the nature of both problems and possible policy responses.A formidable obstacle to understanding the nature and scope of consumers’ mortgage-related complaints has been a lack of data. The first major aim of the current study is to address that shortcoming by turning to the OCC’s Customer Assistance Group (CAG) data. Since the late-1990s, the OCC, via its CAG system, has documented at the individual account level a broad range of complaints about customers’ credit issues with national banks. By aggregating individual case information across categories of mortgage loan-related complaints over time, the current analysis examines trends in consumer complaints at both the national and state levels.The second major goal of the paper is to investigate ways in which the CAG mortgage loan complaint data can add insight to our understanding of the ongoing problems plaguing the residential real estate markets. Broadly, the study’s perspective is to ask whether, and how, detailed knowledge about the nature and scope of consumers’ mortgage-related complaints confirms or contradicts commonly-held presumptions. In the absence of previous research to guide such an investigation of consumers’ mortgage-related complaints, the current study is of necessity exploratory rather than definitive in nature. Nevertheless, this analysis identifies several issues meriting further empirical research that could benefit from the incorporation of the CAG complaints data with more traditional quantitative information about mortgage market activities.","PeriodicalId":306816,"journal":{"name":"Econometrics: Applied Econometric Modeling in Microeconomics eJournal","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometrics: Applied Econometric Modeling in Microeconomics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1987196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The historic boom and subsequent, on-going bust in the U.S. residential mortgage market over the past decade have been periods of revolutionary change in consumer credit access. In particular, the burgeoning subprime mortgage market intertwined with the explosive growth of nontraditional mortgages increased not only the number of households to whom mortgage credit was extended, but also the array of mortgage products available to them. Currently, record numbers of households face foreclosure, and mortgage loan delinquency rates continue to climb. Related to these disturbing trends are widespread observations that a significant number of households have not fully understood the terms of the mortgage contracts to which they committed, especially as from the peak of the subprime lending boom in late 2005 and early 2006. Research on consumers’, lenders’, and regulators’ behaviors over the ongoing turmoil in the mortgage market has addressed a range of issues, including the benefits and pitfalls of recent innovations in mortgage finance, the shifting roles of bank versus nonbank lenders and servicers, federal-level and state-level supervision of mortgage market participants, and predatory lending. One aspect of mortgage activity receiving very little systematic analysis is the nature of consumers’ complaints about both the mortgage origination and the servicing processes. In view of widespread belief about exploitative and abusive practices in the residential mortgage industry, quantitative information about borrower complaints could improve policy makers’ grasp of the nature of both problems and possible policy responses.A formidable obstacle to understanding the nature and scope of consumers’ mortgage-related complaints has been a lack of data. The first major aim of the current study is to address that shortcoming by turning to the OCC’s Customer Assistance Group (CAG) data. Since the late-1990s, the OCC, via its CAG system, has documented at the individual account level a broad range of complaints about customers’ credit issues with national banks. By aggregating individual case information across categories of mortgage loan-related complaints over time, the current analysis examines trends in consumer complaints at both the national and state levels.The second major goal of the paper is to investigate ways in which the CAG mortgage loan complaint data can add insight to our understanding of the ongoing problems plaguing the residential real estate markets. Broadly, the study’s perspective is to ask whether, and how, detailed knowledge about the nature and scope of consumers’ mortgage-related complaints confirms or contradicts commonly-held presumptions. In the absence of previous research to guide such an investigation of consumers’ mortgage-related complaints, the current study is of necessity exploratory rather than definitive in nature. Nevertheless, this analysis identifies several issues meriting further empirical research that could benefit from the incorporation of the CAG complaints data with more traditional quantitative information about mortgage market activities.
2001-2008年消费者按揭贷款投诉及按揭市场盛衰
在过去的十年里,美国住房抵押贷款市场的历史性繁荣和随后持续的萧条一直是消费者信贷渠道发生革命性变化的时期。特别是,新兴的次级抵押贷款市场与非传统抵押贷款的爆炸性增长交织在一起,不仅增加了获得抵押贷款的家庭数量,而且增加了可供他们使用的抵押贷款产品的种类。目前,面临止赎的家庭数量创历史新高,抵押贷款拖欠率继续攀升。与这些令人不安的趋势相关的是,人们普遍观察到,相当多的家庭并没有完全理解他们所承诺的抵押贷款合同的条款,尤其是从2005年底和2006年初次贷热潮的高峰期开始。对消费者、贷款人和监管者在抵押贷款市场持续动荡中的行为进行的研究,解决了一系列问题,包括抵押贷款融资中最近创新的好处和陷阱,银行与非银行贷款人和服务商角色的转变,联邦和州一级对抵押贷款市场参与者的监管,以及掠夺性贷款。很少有系统分析的抵押贷款活动的一个方面是消费者对抵押贷款发起和服务过程的投诉的性质。鉴于人们普遍认为住房抵押贷款行业存在剥削和滥用行为,有关借款人投诉的定量信息可以提高政策制定者对问题性质和可能的政策应对措施的把握。要了解消费者抵押贷款相关投诉的性质和范围,一个巨大的障碍是缺乏数据。当前研究的第一个主要目的是通过转向OCC的客户援助组(CAG)数据来解决这一缺点。自上世纪90年代末以来,OCC通过其CAG系统,在个人账户层面记录了有关客户在国家银行信贷问题的广泛投诉。随着时间的推移,通过汇总抵押贷款相关投诉类别的个案信息,当前的分析检查了国家和州两级消费者投诉的趋势。本文的第二个主要目标是调查CAG抵押贷款投诉数据可以增加我们对困扰住宅房地产市场的持续问题的理解的方式。总的来说,这项研究的目的是询问,关于消费者抵押贷款相关投诉的性质和范围的详细信息,是否以及如何证实或反驳普遍持有的假设。由于缺乏先前的研究来指导对消费者抵押贷款相关投诉的调查,目前的研究必然是探索性的,而不是决定性的。尽管如此,本分析确定了几个值得进一步实证研究的问题,这些问题可能受益于将CAG投诉数据与有关抵押贷款市场活动的更传统的定量信息相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信