Exploring the Argumentation Characteristics in SSI Video Discussion Area of Online Video Learning Website

2022 10th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET) Pub Date : 2022-04-09 DOI:10.1109/ICIET55102.2022.9778977

Xinyue Jiao, Rui Wang, Su Cai

{"title":"Exploring the Argumentation Characteristics in SSI Video Discussion Area of Online Video Learning Website","authors":"Xinyue Jiao, Rui Wang, Su Cai","doi":"10.1109/ICIET55102.2022.9778977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Argumentation is an essential aspect of scientific thinking and plays an important role in the research and practice of science education. In recent years, argumentation in the context of socio-scientific issues (SSI) has attracted extensive attention of educational researchers. The purpose of this study is to explore the argumentation characteristics of SSIs in online video learning website. The content analysis method was used to conduct coding and discourse analysis of 112 argumentation discourses in the discussion area of online video learning websites, and revealed the argumentation characteristics of high-likes comments and the different argumentation performances of high-quality and low-quality arguments. The results showed that in the discussion area, Data and Warrant account for the largest proportion, while Rebuttal and Qualifier account for the least. High-quality arguments have more sufficient Claim, Data and Warrant, can proposed difficult Qualifier as well. Low-quality arguments mainly propose Data, with more Off-topic and Rebuttals, which mostly deviates from the argumentation content and lacks logic and scientificity.","PeriodicalId":371262,"journal":{"name":"2022 10th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 10th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIET55102.2022.9778977","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Argumentation is an essential aspect of scientific thinking and plays an important role in the research and practice of science education. In recent years, argumentation in the context of socio-scientific issues (SSI) has attracted extensive attention of educational researchers. The purpose of this study is to explore the argumentation characteristics of SSIs in online video learning website. The content analysis method was used to conduct coding and discourse analysis of 112 argumentation discourses in the discussion area of online video learning websites, and revealed the argumentation characteristics of high-likes comments and the different argumentation performances of high-quality and low-quality arguments. The results showed that in the discussion area, Data and Warrant account for the largest proportion, while Rebuttal and Qualifier account for the least. High-quality arguments have more sufficient Claim, Data and Warrant, can proposed difficult Qualifier as well. Low-quality arguments mainly propose Data, with more Off-topic and Rebuttals, which mostly deviates from the argumentation content and lacks logic and scientificity.

查看原文本刊更多论文

在线视频学习网站SSI视频讨论区议论文特点探析

论证是科学思维的重要组成部分，在科学教育的研究和实践中发挥着重要作用。近年来，社会科学问题语境下的论证引起了教育研究者的广泛关注。本研究的目的是探讨网络视频学习网站中ssi的论证特征。运用内容分析法对在线视频学习网站讨论区112篇论证语篇进行编码和语篇分析，揭示高点赞评论的论证特征以及高质量与低质量论证的不同论证表现。结果显示，在讨论区中，Data和Warrant所占比例最大，而Rebuttal和Qualifier所占比例最小。高质量的论证有更充分的Claim、Data和Warrant，也可以提出困难的限定词。低质量的论证以提出数据为主，离题和反驳较多，多偏离论证内容，缺乏逻辑性和科学性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

2022 10th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET)

自引率

0.00%

发文量