Managing Product Complexity and Working Capital Risk Using Buyer Behavior and Hedge Packaging

G. Mitchell, Erika Wikstrom, Joseph Belcastro
{"title":"Managing Product Complexity and Working Capital Risk Using Buyer Behavior and Hedge Packaging","authors":"G. Mitchell, Erika Wikstrom, Joseph Belcastro","doi":"10.1115/imece2000-1184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A manufacturing firm creates share-holder value by consistently earning a return on invested capital (ROIC) that exceeds its cost of capital (COC) (Copeland et al, 1995). The amount of value created is impacted directly by the amount of capital invested, highlighting the importance of effective capital allocation. Firms can add significant value through creative ways of balancing customer requirements and working capital needs. This paper describes a generic methodology that uses customer-buying behavior to construct product offerings that minimize working capital risk without impacting service performance.\n The methodology is specifically applied in an environment where product and option offerings can result in thousands of final product configurations. In these complex manufacturing environments, high-velocity product configurations and option packages are used to create hedge packages (a form of dynamic safety stock) of components with longer lead times than market requirements for finished product delivery. In many cases, the lead times of very complex and costly components can exceed customer delivery requirements by a factor of 10. For example, customers may expect delivery of final products within one week, yet key components of the finished product may require ten or more weeks of lead-time. Further exacerbating the situation are the realities that the longest lead items are by nature very complex and costly, and sales forecasting is very difficult. If inventory is managed too aggressively, part shortages, frequent un-planning or rescheduling messages to vendors, late deliveries, poor service reliability, and lost revenues are typical results.\n This paper describes a fact-based and market-based methodology to hedge the forecast of key product components and achieve the correct balance between working capital and service requirements. Central to the process is the use of the “Affinity Analysis” tool. This tool is used to process large arrays of product configuration data with the objective of recognizing significant affinities between elements. In an automobile example, when a customer purchases a manual transmission how often do they also choose sport suspension? Knowledge of all of the high-correlation or high-affinity product selections or options can be exploited in the material requirements planning process without having to individually forecast the usage of all options. Forecasting at the individual option level is very difficult and rarely correct. The knowledge of key component affinities facilitates the creation of high-velocity product configurations and option packages that maximize revenue and minimize working capital and manufacturing complexity.\n The paper includes a description of the affinity analysis tool, the input and output files, how the tool is used, and how the high-velocity and hedge packages are created. Furthermore, the reader is provided with a sample application of the methodology in a complex heavy-equipment manufacturing environment.","PeriodicalId":186011,"journal":{"name":"Successfully Managing the Risk and Development of Your Business and Technology","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Successfully Managing the Risk and Development of Your Business and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2000-1184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A manufacturing firm creates share-holder value by consistently earning a return on invested capital (ROIC) that exceeds its cost of capital (COC) (Copeland et al, 1995). The amount of value created is impacted directly by the amount of capital invested, highlighting the importance of effective capital allocation. Firms can add significant value through creative ways of balancing customer requirements and working capital needs. This paper describes a generic methodology that uses customer-buying behavior to construct product offerings that minimize working capital risk without impacting service performance. The methodology is specifically applied in an environment where product and option offerings can result in thousands of final product configurations. In these complex manufacturing environments, high-velocity product configurations and option packages are used to create hedge packages (a form of dynamic safety stock) of components with longer lead times than market requirements for finished product delivery. In many cases, the lead times of very complex and costly components can exceed customer delivery requirements by a factor of 10. For example, customers may expect delivery of final products within one week, yet key components of the finished product may require ten or more weeks of lead-time. Further exacerbating the situation are the realities that the longest lead items are by nature very complex and costly, and sales forecasting is very difficult. If inventory is managed too aggressively, part shortages, frequent un-planning or rescheduling messages to vendors, late deliveries, poor service reliability, and lost revenues are typical results. This paper describes a fact-based and market-based methodology to hedge the forecast of key product components and achieve the correct balance between working capital and service requirements. Central to the process is the use of the “Affinity Analysis” tool. This tool is used to process large arrays of product configuration data with the objective of recognizing significant affinities between elements. In an automobile example, when a customer purchases a manual transmission how often do they also choose sport suspension? Knowledge of all of the high-correlation or high-affinity product selections or options can be exploited in the material requirements planning process without having to individually forecast the usage of all options. Forecasting at the individual option level is very difficult and rarely correct. The knowledge of key component affinities facilitates the creation of high-velocity product configurations and option packages that maximize revenue and minimize working capital and manufacturing complexity. The paper includes a description of the affinity analysis tool, the input and output files, how the tool is used, and how the high-velocity and hedge packages are created. Furthermore, the reader is provided with a sample application of the methodology in a complex heavy-equipment manufacturing environment.
使用买方行为和对冲包装管理产品复杂性和营运资金风险
制造企业通过持续赚取超过其资本成本(COC)的投资资本回报率(ROIC)来创造股东价值(Copeland et al, 1995)。创造价值的多少直接受到投入资本的多少的影响,这就突出了有效的资本配置的重要性。企业可以通过平衡客户需求和营运资金需求的创造性方法来增加显著的价值。本文描述了一种通用的方法,该方法使用客户购买行为来构建产品,从而在不影响服务绩效的情况下将营运资金风险降至最低。该方法特别适用于产品和选项提供可能导致数千种最终产品配置的环境。在这些复杂的制造环境中,高速产品配置和选项包用于创建组件的对冲包(动态安全库存的一种形式),其交货时间长于成品交付的市场要求。在许多情况下,非常复杂和昂贵的组件的交付时间可能超过客户交付需求的10倍。例如,客户可能期望在一周内交付最终产品,但最终产品的关键组件可能需要十周或更长时间的交付时间。使情况进一步恶化的现实是,最长的产品本质上非常复杂和昂贵,而且销售预测非常困难。如果库存管理过于激进,通常会导致零件短缺、频繁的向供应商发送未计划或重新安排的消息、延迟交付、服务可靠性差以及收入损失。本文描述了一种基于事实和市场的方法来对冲关键产品组件的预测,并在营运资金和服务需求之间实现正确的平衡。该过程的核心是“亲和分析”工具的使用。该工具用于处理大型产品配置数据阵列,目的是识别元素之间的重要亲和力。以汽车为例,当客户购买手动变速器时,他们选择运动悬架的频率是多少?所有高相关性或高亲和性的产品选择或选项的知识可以在材料需求计划过程中得到利用,而不必单独预测所有选项的使用情况。在单个期权层面进行预测是非常困难的,而且很少是正确的。对关键组件亲缘关系的了解有助于创建高速产品配置和选项包,从而最大化收入,最小化营运资本和制造复杂性。本文包括亲和力分析工具的描述,输入和输出文件,如何使用工具,以及如何创建高速和对冲包。此外,读者提供了一个样本应用的方法在一个复杂的重型设备制造环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信