8 Ethical and legal aspects of burns care

FRCA, MPhil Malcolm G. Booth (Consultant in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care)
{"title":"8 Ethical and legal aspects of burns care","authors":"FRCA, MPhil Malcolm G. Booth (Consultant in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care)","doi":"10.1016/S0950-3501(97)80020-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Burns injuries affect 10 000 people annually in the UK and of these 650–700 die. Many who would have previously died now survive as the treatment of burns patients improves. Ethical dilemmas may occur when decisions need to be made about the treatment of incompetent patients. These decision may concern the initiation, continuation or termination of treatment. The ethical principles of autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice are described and how their application allows, both morally and legally, the initiation and termination of treatment, even when the patient cannot be involved in the decision. The debate surrounding advance directives which would give the patient some control over what was done to him when incompetent to make decisions and euthanasia are reviewed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":80610,"journal":{"name":"Bailliere's clinical anaesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0950-3501(97)80020-7","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bailliere's clinical anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950350197800207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Burns injuries affect 10 000 people annually in the UK and of these 650–700 die. Many who would have previously died now survive as the treatment of burns patients improves. Ethical dilemmas may occur when decisions need to be made about the treatment of incompetent patients. These decision may concern the initiation, continuation or termination of treatment. The ethical principles of autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice are described and how their application allows, both morally and legally, the initiation and termination of treatment, even when the patient cannot be involved in the decision. The debate surrounding advance directives which would give the patient some control over what was done to him when incompetent to make decisions and euthanasia are reviewed.

烧伤护理的伦理和法律方面
在英国,每年有1万人受到烧伤,其中650-700人死亡。随着烧伤患者治疗的改善,许多以前可能会死亡的人现在活了下来。当需要决定如何治疗不称职的病人时,可能会出现伦理困境。这些决定可能涉及治疗的开始、继续或终止。描述了自主、仁慈、非恶意和正义的伦理原则,以及它们的应用如何在道德和法律上允许治疗的开始和结束,即使病人不能参与决定。关于预先指示的争论,当病人无法做出决定和安乐死时,预先指示会给病人一些控制权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信