{"title":"Logico-ontological aspects of the pandemic","authors":"Aleksandar Lukić","doi":"10.2298/theo2204169l","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the author examines the logical and ontological aspects of\n pandemic. Relatedly, the the definition of a pandemic is scrutinized. The\n very word pandemic (????????) comes from the Classical Greek language and\n refers to something pertains to all (???) people (?????). However, this\n cannot be of great use for the definition of pandemic, because with each one\n known so far, it was about a wide distribution in the people, and not about\n the entire people. We will try to show that a precise definition (or precise\n description) of the pandemic does not exist, which means that the very\n notion is not clear, and therefore the declaration of a pandemic is a matter\n of preference of those who declare it. ?Wide distribution? is a wide notion\n that could be a part of acceptable scientific definition. Such a lack is,\n however, compensated by the frequent use of emotional determinants that only\n obscure the problem, instead of illuminating it. Expressions such as:\n ?invisible enemy?, ?social distancing?, ?new normal?, ?responsibility?,\n ?solidarity?, ?state of war?, ?virus attack? and others, have an emotional\n function, the goal of which is to replace the scientific, rational\n understanding of things.","PeriodicalId":374875,"journal":{"name":"Theoria, Beograd","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoria, Beograd","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/theo2204169l","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this paper, the author examines the logical and ontological aspects of
pandemic. Relatedly, the the definition of a pandemic is scrutinized. The
very word pandemic (????????) comes from the Classical Greek language and
refers to something pertains to all (???) people (?????). However, this
cannot be of great use for the definition of pandemic, because with each one
known so far, it was about a wide distribution in the people, and not about
the entire people. We will try to show that a precise definition (or precise
description) of the pandemic does not exist, which means that the very
notion is not clear, and therefore the declaration of a pandemic is a matter
of preference of those who declare it. ?Wide distribution? is a wide notion
that could be a part of acceptable scientific definition. Such a lack is,
however, compensated by the frequent use of emotional determinants that only
obscure the problem, instead of illuminating it. Expressions such as:
?invisible enemy?, ?social distancing?, ?new normal?, ?responsibility?,
?solidarity?, ?state of war?, ?virus attack? and others, have an emotional
function, the goal of which is to replace the scientific, rational
understanding of things.