Accused War Criminals qua Perpetrators: On the Visual Signification of Criminal Guilt

Katarina Ristić
{"title":"Accused War Criminals qua Perpetrators: On the Visual Signification of Criminal Guilt","authors":"Katarina Ristić","doi":"10.21039/jpr.2.2.42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines media representations of two high-ranking defendants from Serbia indicted by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) for war crimes in Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina. By drawing on a social semiotic multimodal analysis and by distinguishing between four types of perpetrator images (‘the politician’, ‘the strategist’, ‘the combatant’, and ‘the executioner’), the article provides a detailed analysis of the way in which visual material from the courtroom and from the war is used in television news broadcasts in order to ascribe – or not to ascribe – criminal guilt to the accused. Considering the specific culture of denial in Serbia, persistent despite of dozens of war crimes trials conducted at the ICTY and in domestic courts, the article further examines the use of visual materials in the defendant-centered national discourse and the victim-centered transnational discourse. The article argues that the use of visuals as exemplified in the victim-centered discourse is necessary albeit not sufficient for triggering the process of dealing with the past.","PeriodicalId":152877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perpetrator Research","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perpetrator Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21039/jpr.2.2.42","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article examines media representations of two high-ranking defendants from Serbia indicted by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) for war crimes in Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina. By drawing on a social semiotic multimodal analysis and by distinguishing between four types of perpetrator images (‘the politician’, ‘the strategist’, ‘the combatant’, and ‘the executioner’), the article provides a detailed analysis of the way in which visual material from the courtroom and from the war is used in television news broadcasts in order to ascribe – or not to ascribe – criminal guilt to the accused. Considering the specific culture of denial in Serbia, persistent despite of dozens of war crimes trials conducted at the ICTY and in domestic courts, the article further examines the use of visual materials in the defendant-centered national discourse and the victim-centered transnational discourse. The article argues that the use of visuals as exemplified in the victim-centered discourse is necessary albeit not sufficient for triggering the process of dealing with the past.
被控战犯作为犯罪者:论刑事罪责的视觉意义
本文审查媒体对前南斯拉夫问题国际刑事法庭(前南问题国际法庭)起诉的两名塞尔维亚高级被告在克罗地亚和波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那犯下战争罪的报道。通过社会符号学的多模式分析,并通过区分四种类型的犯罪者形象(“政治家”、“战略家”、“战斗人员”和“刽子手”),本文详细分析了电视新闻广播中使用法庭和战争中的视觉材料的方式,以便将刑事罪行归咎于或不归咎于被告。考虑到塞尔维亚特有的否认文化,尽管前南国际刑事法庭和国内法院进行了数十次战争罪审判,但这种文化仍然存在,本文进一步探讨了视觉材料在以被告为中心的国家话语和以受害者为中心的跨国话语中的使用。文章认为,在以受害者为中心的话语中,使用视觉效果是必要的,尽管不足以触发处理过去的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信