Republican Remedies

S. Skowronek, John A. Dearborn, Desmond King
{"title":"Republican Remedies","authors":"S. Skowronek, John A. Dearborn, Desmond King","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197543085.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since its founding of the republic, Americans have devised a variety of different ways to reconcile unity with depth, separation with checks, and presidentialism with republicanism. This chapter surveys the succession of informal institutional and organizational improvisations that periodically altered practical working relationships within the American constitutional system. These extra-constitutional contrivances created several distinctive “systems” of administration, each of which preserved the republican idea of inter-branch collaboration. Nineteenth-century remedies were party-based; twentieth-century remedies were administration-based. The move from one system to the next marked a profound change in the operation of government at large, but at every turn, a more powerful presidency was corralled into novel arrangements that reaffirmed collective responsibility. The origins of our beleaguered republic lay in the 1970s, when that spirit of accommodation began to break down. Presidents grew more independent in their political and institutional powers, and they asserted their right to unitary control over the executive branch more vigorously. In the congressional pushback, collaboration gave way to a constitutional face-off.","PeriodicalId":387217,"journal":{"name":"Phantoms of a Beleaguered Republic","volume":"110 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phantoms of a Beleaguered Republic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197543085.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since its founding of the republic, Americans have devised a variety of different ways to reconcile unity with depth, separation with checks, and presidentialism with republicanism. This chapter surveys the succession of informal institutional and organizational improvisations that periodically altered practical working relationships within the American constitutional system. These extra-constitutional contrivances created several distinctive “systems” of administration, each of which preserved the republican idea of inter-branch collaboration. Nineteenth-century remedies were party-based; twentieth-century remedies were administration-based. The move from one system to the next marked a profound change in the operation of government at large, but at every turn, a more powerful presidency was corralled into novel arrangements that reaffirmed collective responsibility. The origins of our beleaguered republic lay in the 1970s, when that spirit of accommodation began to break down. Presidents grew more independent in their political and institutional powers, and they asserted their right to unitary control over the executive branch more vigorously. In the congressional pushback, collaboration gave way to a constitutional face-off.
共和党的补救措施
自共和国成立以来,美国人设计了各种不同的方式来调和团结与深度、分离与制衡、总统制与共和主义。本章考察了在美国宪法体系中,非正式制度和组织的即兴创作周期性地改变了实际工作关系。这些超越宪法的发明创造了几个独特的管理“系统”,每个系统都保留了共和主义的跨部门合作理念。19世纪的救济是以政党为基础的;20世纪的救济是以行政为基础的。从一种制度到另一种制度的转变标志着整个政府运作的深刻变化,但在每一个转折点上,一个更强大的总统都被纳入了新的安排,重申了集体责任。我们这个陷入困境的共和国的起源要追溯到上世纪70年代,当时这种和解精神开始瓦解。总统在政治和机构权力方面变得更加独立,他们更有力地主张自己对行政部门的统一控制。在国会的阻挠下,合作让位给了宪法上的对峙。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信