Two Notes on the Commentary on the Torah of R. Yehudah he-Ḥasid

H. Soloveitchik
{"title":"Two Notes on the Commentary on the Torah of R. Yehudah he-Ḥasid","authors":"H. Soloveitchik","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv19cw9w0.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter assesses R. Yehudah he-Ḥasid's Commentary on the Torah (1976). R. Yehudah claimed that several verses were written after the time of Moses. R. Moshe Feinstein, the leading halakhic decisor (posek) of the time, had apparently been shown an advance copy of choice sections of the book and declared the statement of non-Mosaic authorship to be heretical. As it was inconceivable that R. Yehudah he-Ḥasid was a heretic, the work was clearly a forgery, or certain passages had been cunningly inserted into his blameless composition to better infiltrate the bastions of the faithful. That the composition is that of R. Yehudah he-Ḥasid there can be little question; there are too many citations from this commentary, specifically attributed to him, in medieval writings to leave room for doubt. Yet it is equally true that the work does attribute several verses of the Pentateuch to later writers.","PeriodicalId":431302,"journal":{"name":"Collected Essays","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collected Essays","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv19cw9w0.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter assesses R. Yehudah he-Ḥasid's Commentary on the Torah (1976). R. Yehudah claimed that several verses were written after the time of Moses. R. Moshe Feinstein, the leading halakhic decisor (posek) of the time, had apparently been shown an advance copy of choice sections of the book and declared the statement of non-Mosaic authorship to be heretical. As it was inconceivable that R. Yehudah he-Ḥasid was a heretic, the work was clearly a forgery, or certain passages had been cunningly inserted into his blameless composition to better infiltrate the bastions of the faithful. That the composition is that of R. Yehudah he-Ḥasid there can be little question; there are too many citations from this commentary, specifically attributed to him, in medieval writings to leave room for doubt. Yet it is equally true that the work does attribute several verses of the Pentateuch to later writers.
关于R.耶胡达的Torah注释的两个注释-Ḥasid
本章评估R.耶胡达-Ḥasid的《托拉注释》(1976)。R.耶胡达声称有几节经文是在摩西时代之后写成的。r·摩西·范斯坦(R. Moshe Feinstein)是当时主要的哈拉卡(halakhic)决策者,他显然已经看到了这本书精选部分的预印本,并宣布非摩西作者的说法是异端。因为很难想象R.耶胡达(-Ḥasid)是一个异教徒,所以这部作品显然是伪造的,或者某些段落被巧妙地插入到他无可指责的作品中,以便更好地渗透到忠实的堡垒中。这是耶胡达的作品他-Ḥasid这是毫无疑问的;在中世纪的著作中,有太多的引文引用了这篇评注,特别归因于他,留下了怀疑的余地。然而,同样真实的是,这项工作确实将五经的几节经文归因于后来的作家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信