Evaluation of Formal IDEs for Human-Machine Interface Design and Analysis: The Case of CIRCUS and PVSio-web

F-IDE@FM Pub Date : 2017-01-27 DOI:10.4204/EPTCS.240.1
Camille Fayollas, C. Martinie, Philippe A. Palanque, P. Masci, M. Harrison, J. C. Campos, S. Silva
{"title":"Evaluation of Formal IDEs for Human-Machine Interface Design and Analysis: The Case of CIRCUS and PVSio-web","authors":"Camille Fayollas, C. Martinie, Philippe A. Palanque, P. Masci, M. Harrison, J. C. Campos, S. Silva","doi":"10.4204/EPTCS.240.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Critical human-machine interfaces are present in many systems including avionics systems and medical devices. Use error is a concern in these systems both in terms of hardware panels and input devices, and the software that drives the interfaces. Guaranteeing safe usability, in terms of buttons, knobs and displays is now a key element in the overall safety of the system. New integrated development environments (IDEs) based on formal methods technologies have been developed by the research community to support the design and analysis of high-confidence human-machine interfaces. To date, little work has focused on the comparison of these particular types of formal IDEs. This paper compares and evaluates two state-of-the-art toolkits: CIRCUS, a model-based development and analysis tool based on Petri net extensions, and PVSio-web, a prototyping toolkit based on the PVS theorem proving system.","PeriodicalId":339743,"journal":{"name":"F-IDE@FM","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F-IDE@FM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.240.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Critical human-machine interfaces are present in many systems including avionics systems and medical devices. Use error is a concern in these systems both in terms of hardware panels and input devices, and the software that drives the interfaces. Guaranteeing safe usability, in terms of buttons, knobs and displays is now a key element in the overall safety of the system. New integrated development environments (IDEs) based on formal methods technologies have been developed by the research community to support the design and analysis of high-confidence human-machine interfaces. To date, little work has focused on the comparison of these particular types of formal IDEs. This paper compares and evaluates two state-of-the-art toolkits: CIRCUS, a model-based development and analysis tool based on Petri net extensions, and PVSio-web, a prototyping toolkit based on the PVS theorem proving system.
人机界面设计与分析的形式化ide的评价:以CIRCUS和PVSio-web为例
关键的人机界面存在于许多系统中,包括航空电子系统和医疗设备。在这些系统中,无论是在硬件面板和输入设备方面,还是在驱动接口的软件方面,使用错误都是一个值得关注的问题。保证按钮、旋钮和显示器的安全可用性现在是系统整体安全的关键因素。基于形式化方法技术的新型集成开发环境(ide)已经被研究团体开发出来,以支持高置信度人机界面的设计和分析。迄今为止,很少有工作集中在这些特定类型的正式ide的比较上。本文对基于Petri网扩展的基于模型的开发分析工具CIRCUS和基于PVS定理证明系统的原型工具箱PVSio-web两种最先进的工具进行了比较和评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信