Philosophy of Mind: Heidegger’s Hermeneutics with a view to Yogacara Thought

You-Jeong Park
{"title":"Philosophy of Mind: Heidegger’s Hermeneutics with a view to Yogacara Thought","authors":"You-Jeong Park","doi":"10.47636/gkca.2022.5.2.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper pursues to interpret Heidegger’s hermeneutics as Philosophy of Mind through Yogacara Thought. A famous korean professors’ study is referred in order to arrive at the goal of this study. At first, Yogacara thought is a critical hypothesis between Realism of Hinayana Buddhism and Deconstruction of Mahayana Buddhism. According to Yogacara thought, awareness of phenomena is a transformation of awareness of mind, so there is just consciousness only. In other words, there are eight consciousnesses in our mind, but all consciousnesses are derivatives of Alaya consciousness which covers all potentiality in our mind. Therefore, we can say that Yogacara thought is a mind philosophy. Heidegger’s ontology of Dasein can be understood in the point of view with Yogacara thought very well. Forgetness of Being(Seinsvergessenheit) can be understood as forgetness of Mind, and it leads us to understand the meaning of Being-there(Dasein) and it’s ontological structure. That is, the ontological way of Being-there is a transformation of unconscious mind because existential structure of Being-there can be interpreted as unconscious mind of Alaya consciousness. To conclude, Heidegger’s hermeneutics can be interpreted as a mind philosophy because Heidegger’s ontological fact can be understood Alaya’s unconscious fact.","PeriodicalId":236343,"journal":{"name":"Global Knowledge and Convergence Association","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Knowledge and Convergence Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47636/gkca.2022.5.2.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper pursues to interpret Heidegger’s hermeneutics as Philosophy of Mind through Yogacara Thought. A famous korean professors’ study is referred in order to arrive at the goal of this study. At first, Yogacara thought is a critical hypothesis between Realism of Hinayana Buddhism and Deconstruction of Mahayana Buddhism. According to Yogacara thought, awareness of phenomena is a transformation of awareness of mind, so there is just consciousness only. In other words, there are eight consciousnesses in our mind, but all consciousnesses are derivatives of Alaya consciousness which covers all potentiality in our mind. Therefore, we can say that Yogacara thought is a mind philosophy. Heidegger’s ontology of Dasein can be understood in the point of view with Yogacara thought very well. Forgetness of Being(Seinsvergessenheit) can be understood as forgetness of Mind, and it leads us to understand the meaning of Being-there(Dasein) and it’s ontological structure. That is, the ontological way of Being-there is a transformation of unconscious mind because existential structure of Being-there can be interpreted as unconscious mind of Alaya consciousness. To conclude, Heidegger’s hermeneutics can be interpreted as a mind philosophy because Heidegger’s ontological fact can be understood Alaya’s unconscious fact.
心灵哲学:海德格尔对瑜伽思想的解释学
本文试图通过瑜伽思维将海德格尔的解释学诠释为心灵哲学。为了达到本研究的目的,参考了韩国一位著名教授的研究。瑜伽行思想最初是小乘佛教的现实主义与大乘佛教的解构主义之间的批判假设。根据瑜伽行思想,对现象的觉知是心觉知的转化,所以只有觉知。换句话说,我们的头脑中有八种意识,但所有的意识都是阿拉亚意识的衍生物,它涵盖了我们头脑中的所有潜力。因此,我们可以说瑜伽思想是一种心灵哲学。海德格尔的此在本体论可以用Yogacara思想的观点来理解。存在的遗忘(Seinsvergessenheit)可以理解为心的遗忘,它引导我们理解存在的意义及其本体论结构。也就是说,存在的本体论方式是一种无意识的转化,因为存在的存在结构可以解释为阿拉亚意识的无意识。综上所述,海德格尔的解释学可以被解释为一种心灵哲学,因为海德格尔的本体论事实可以被理解为阿拉亚的无意识事实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信