Corporate Governance Ideology, Human Resource Practices and Senior Staff Salaries

N. Black, P. Stokes
{"title":"Corporate Governance Ideology, Human Resource Practices and Senior Staff Salaries","authors":"N. Black, P. Stokes","doi":"10.5772/INTECHOPEN.96741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines the link between corporate governance ideology and HR (human resource) practices involved in the important and ongoing issue of senior staff salaries. In the spirit of financialization and hyper-individuals, the mainstream corporate governance ideology promotes beliefs about competitive pay and managerial power. These beliefs shape the design and implementation of HR practices by legitimizing the ‘common-sense’ assumption that senior staff members should, primarily, be rewarded for meeting corporate goals. However, our discussion critiques the use of this corporate governance ideology for encouraging myopia and silence amongst remuneration committee members in response to growing inequality. This is exemplified by an inductive analysis of remuneration committee minutes taken from British universities (n = 67). Interestingly, this example also highlighted a marginalized belief about sacrificial leadership that countered this growth under alternative ideology in the spirit of altruism. The chapter recommends the radical proposal that remuneration committees should expand their remit beyond only considering senior staff salaries and promote HR practices that will embed altruism and equality.","PeriodicalId":181420,"journal":{"name":"Beyond Human Resources - Research Paths Towards a New Understanding of Workforce Management Within Organizations [Working Title]","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Beyond Human Resources - Research Paths Towards a New Understanding of Workforce Management Within Organizations [Working Title]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5772/INTECHOPEN.96741","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter examines the link between corporate governance ideology and HR (human resource) practices involved in the important and ongoing issue of senior staff salaries. In the spirit of financialization and hyper-individuals, the mainstream corporate governance ideology promotes beliefs about competitive pay and managerial power. These beliefs shape the design and implementation of HR practices by legitimizing the ‘common-sense’ assumption that senior staff members should, primarily, be rewarded for meeting corporate goals. However, our discussion critiques the use of this corporate governance ideology for encouraging myopia and silence amongst remuneration committee members in response to growing inequality. This is exemplified by an inductive analysis of remuneration committee minutes taken from British universities (n = 67). Interestingly, this example also highlighted a marginalized belief about sacrificial leadership that countered this growth under alternative ideology in the spirit of altruism. The chapter recommends the radical proposal that remuneration committees should expand their remit beyond only considering senior staff salaries and promote HR practices that will embed altruism and equality.
公司治理理念、人力资源实践与高级职员薪酬
本章探讨了公司治理意识形态与HR(人力资源)实践之间的联系,涉及高级员工工资的重要和持续的问题。在金融化和超个人主义的精神下,主流公司治理意识形态提倡竞争性薪酬和管理权力的信念。这些信念塑造了人力资源实践的设计和实施,使“常识性”假设合法化,即高级员工应该主要因实现公司目标而获得奖励。然而,我们的讨论批评了这种公司治理意识形态的使用,因为它鼓励了薪酬委员会成员的短视和沉默,以应对日益严重的不平等。对英国大学薪酬委员会会议记录(n = 67)的归纳分析可以证明这一点。有趣的是,这个例子也突出了一种被边缘化的信念,即牺牲式领导,这种信念在利他主义精神的另类意识形态下对抗这种增长。这一章提出了一个激进的建议,即薪酬委员会应扩大其职权范围,而不仅仅是考虑高级员工的工资,并促进将利他主义和平等纳入人力资源实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信