Visuospatial and verbal memory differences between selected male and female adolescents of the STEM strand

Jan Uriel A. Marcelo, Aryan Arora
{"title":"Visuospatial and verbal memory differences between selected male and female adolescents of the STEM strand","authors":"Jan Uriel A. Marcelo, Aryan Arora","doi":"10.1109/ISECON.2018.8340476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The project began with the researchers trying to see how each gender assimilates learning based on visuospatial and verbal memory of selected Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) adolescents. The project was based from other studies as well as Bem's Gender Schema Theory. The participants included in this project were from the ages of 16–19 years old in Grades 11 and 12. The researchers used the brain training app Peak to be able to measure each participant's capacity for both visuospatial and verbal memory. After measuring the scores and determining the mean for each gender, there seemed to be no significant advantage found by either gender in both male and females, contrary to most found results from other studies. While the female participants tested did have a better mean score than males on both memory tests, the difference found was not significant enough based on the results of the both two sample z-tests, with the results being −0.43 for visuospatial and 1.63 for verbal, which did not meet the required z-score of 1.645 to reject the null hypothesis. Given the opportunity to have access to more resources and time, the researchers plan to continue the study to include other testing methods and not limited to brain training apps in order to come up with more conclusive findings.","PeriodicalId":186215,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC)","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISECON.2018.8340476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The project began with the researchers trying to see how each gender assimilates learning based on visuospatial and verbal memory of selected Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) adolescents. The project was based from other studies as well as Bem's Gender Schema Theory. The participants included in this project were from the ages of 16–19 years old in Grades 11 and 12. The researchers used the brain training app Peak to be able to measure each participant's capacity for both visuospatial and verbal memory. After measuring the scores and determining the mean for each gender, there seemed to be no significant advantage found by either gender in both male and females, contrary to most found results from other studies. While the female participants tested did have a better mean score than males on both memory tests, the difference found was not significant enough based on the results of the both two sample z-tests, with the results being −0.43 for visuospatial and 1.63 for verbal, which did not meet the required z-score of 1.645 to reject the null hypothesis. Given the opportunity to have access to more resources and time, the researchers plan to continue the study to include other testing methods and not limited to brain training apps in order to come up with more conclusive findings.
视觉空间记忆和言语记忆在STEM系的特定男性和女性青少年中的差异
该项目开始时,研究人员试图了解每个性别是如何根据选定的科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)青少年的视觉空间和言语记忆来吸收学习的。该项目基于其他研究以及本姆的性别图式理论。本项目的参与者年龄在16-19岁,为11年级和12年级。研究人员使用大脑训练应用Peak来测量每个参与者的视觉空间和言语记忆能力。在测量了分数并确定了每种性别的平均值之后,似乎没有发现男性和女性中任何一种性别的显著优势,这与其他研究的大多数发现结果相反。虽然女性参与者在两项记忆测试中的平均得分都高于男性,但根据两项样本z-检验的结果,发现的差异并不足够显著,视觉空间测试的结果为- 0.43,语言测试的结果为1.63,这没有达到拒绝原假设所需的1.645的z-得分。如果有机会获得更多的资源和时间,研究人员计划继续研究,包括其他测试方法,而不仅仅局限于大脑训练应用程序,以得出更多结论性的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信