Tradeoff and Sensitivity Analysis of a Hybrid Model for Ranking Commercial Off-the-Shelf Products

H. Ibrahim, B. Far, A. Eberlein
{"title":"Tradeoff and Sensitivity Analysis of a Hybrid Model for Ranking Commercial Off-the-Shelf Products","authors":"H. Ibrahim, B. Far, A. Eberlein","doi":"10.1109/ECBS.2009.47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite its popularity, The COTS-based development still faces some challenges, in particular the evaluation and selection process in which uncertainty plays a major role. A hybrid model, composed of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and Bayesian Belief Network (BBN), is proposed to evaluate and rank various COTS candidates while explicitly considering uncertainty. Several input parameters such as weights assigned to evaluation criteria, relative scores for various COTS candidates, and prior belief about the satisfaction of various attributes associated with the evaluation criteria need to be estimated. The estimation process of these input parameters is subject to uncertainty that limits the applicability of the model’s results. In this paper, we apply sensitivity analysis to check the validity and robustness of the model. Further, we apply tradeoff analysis to explore the impact of relaxing one criterion in order to achieve an increase in another criterion that is considered as more desirable in a particular project context. A digital library system is used as a case study to illustrate how the proposed tradeoff and sensitivity analysis was performed.","PeriodicalId":263562,"journal":{"name":"2009 16th Annual IEEE International Conference and Workshop on the Engineering of Computer Based Systems","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 16th Annual IEEE International Conference and Workshop on the Engineering of Computer Based Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECBS.2009.47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Despite its popularity, The COTS-based development still faces some challenges, in particular the evaluation and selection process in which uncertainty plays a major role. A hybrid model, composed of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and Bayesian Belief Network (BBN), is proposed to evaluate and rank various COTS candidates while explicitly considering uncertainty. Several input parameters such as weights assigned to evaluation criteria, relative scores for various COTS candidates, and prior belief about the satisfaction of various attributes associated with the evaluation criteria need to be estimated. The estimation process of these input parameters is subject to uncertainty that limits the applicability of the model’s results. In this paper, we apply sensitivity analysis to check the validity and robustness of the model. Further, we apply tradeoff analysis to explore the impact of relaxing one criterion in order to achieve an increase in another criterion that is considered as more desirable in a particular project context. A digital library system is used as a case study to illustrate how the proposed tradeoff and sensitivity analysis was performed.
商品现货排序混合模型的权衡与灵敏度分析
尽管基于cots的开发很受欢迎,但仍然面临一些挑战,特别是在评估和选择过程中,不确定性起着主要作用。在明确考虑不确定性的情况下,提出了一种层次分析法(AHP)和贝叶斯信念网络(BBN)的混合模型,对候选COTS进行评估和排序。需要估计几个输入参数,例如分配给评估标准的权重,各种COTS候选的相对分数,以及与评估标准相关的各种属性的满意度的先验信念。这些输入参数的估计过程受到不确定性的影响,这限制了模型结果的适用性。在本文中,我们采用敏感性分析来检验模型的有效性和鲁棒性。此外,我们应用权衡分析来探索放松一个标准的影响,以实现在特定项目环境中被认为更可取的另一个标准的增加。以数字图书馆系统为例,说明了如何进行所提出的权衡和敏感性分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信