On the mathematical foundations of smoothness constraints for the determination of optical flow and for surface reconstruction

M. A. Snyder
{"title":"On the mathematical foundations of smoothness constraints for the determination of optical flow and for surface reconstruction","authors":"M. A. Snyder","doi":"10.1109/WVM.1989.47100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gradient-based approaches to the computation of optical flow often use a minimization technique incorporating a smoothness constraint on the optical flow field. The author derives the most general form of such a smoothness constraint which is quadratic in first or second derivatives of the grey-level image intensity function, based on three simple assumptions about the smoothness constraint: (1) that it be expressed in a form which is independent of the choice of Cartesian coordinate system in the image; (2) that it be positive definite; and (3) that it not couple different components of the optical flow. It is shown that there are essentially only four such constraints; any smoothness constraint satisfying all three assumptions must be a linear combination of these four, possibly multipled by certain quantities of these four, possibly multipled by certain quantities invariant under a change in the Cartesian coordinate system. Beginning with the three assumptions mentioned above, the author mathematically demonstrates that all the best-known smoothness constraints appearing in the literature are special cases of this general form, and, in particular, that the 'weight matrix' introduced by H.-H. Nagel (1983) is essentially the only physically plausible such constraint.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":342419,"journal":{"name":"[1989] Proceedings. Workshop on Visual Motion","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"76","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1989] Proceedings. Workshop on Visual Motion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WVM.1989.47100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 76

Abstract

Gradient-based approaches to the computation of optical flow often use a minimization technique incorporating a smoothness constraint on the optical flow field. The author derives the most general form of such a smoothness constraint which is quadratic in first or second derivatives of the grey-level image intensity function, based on three simple assumptions about the smoothness constraint: (1) that it be expressed in a form which is independent of the choice of Cartesian coordinate system in the image; (2) that it be positive definite; and (3) that it not couple different components of the optical flow. It is shown that there are essentially only four such constraints; any smoothness constraint satisfying all three assumptions must be a linear combination of these four, possibly multipled by certain quantities of these four, possibly multipled by certain quantities invariant under a change in the Cartesian coordinate system. Beginning with the three assumptions mentioned above, the author mathematically demonstrates that all the best-known smoothness constraints appearing in the literature are special cases of this general form, and, in particular, that the 'weight matrix' introduced by H.-H. Nagel (1983) is essentially the only physically plausible such constraint.<>
光流确定和表面重建的光滑性约束的数学基础
基于梯度的光流计算方法通常使用包含光流场平滑约束的最小化技术。本文从三个简单的假设出发,导出了灰度图像强度函数一阶导数或二阶导数二次型平滑约束的最一般形式:(1)平滑约束的表示形式与图像中笛卡尔坐标系的选择无关;(二)是肯定的;(3)不耦合不同分量的光流。结果表明,基本上只有四个这样的约束条件;任何满足这三个假设的光滑性约束必须是这四个的线性组合,可能乘以这四个的某些量,可能乘以在笛卡尔坐标系中不变的某些量。从上面提到的三个假设开始,作者从数学上证明了文献中出现的所有著名的平滑约束都是这种一般形式的特殊情况,特别是h - h引入的“权矩阵”。Nagel(1983)基本上是物理上唯一合理的这种约束
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信