59 Continuous spinal anesthesia – a newborn technique for times of need?

S. Moreira, I. Neri, R. Silva
{"title":"59 Continuous spinal anesthesia – a newborn technique for times of need?","authors":"S. Moreira, I. Neri, R. Silva","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2021-esra.59","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and AimsDescribed during World War II, continuous spinal anesthesia (CSA) enables continuous administration of intrathecal drugs, offering several anesthetic options versus single shot technique, although underutilised.Here we present 4 cases of CSA performed for patients undergoing urgent upper abdominal and lower extremity orthopedic surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our patients were ranked between 90–100 years old with ASA score IV, in which we highlight the presence of ischemic heart disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.MethodsInvasive hemodynamic measurement was performed before CSA technique. Given the lack of microcatheter-over-the-needle kits in our center, we performed the technique using Perifix® Complete Set – B Braun, with full aseptic technique. The 18G Tuohy needle was introduced via a midline approach until CSF was encountered. The 20G catheter was then introduced 3cm into the subarachnoid space. In all situations we opted for the administration of sufentanil 0.0025 mg plus subsequent aliquots of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.125%, guided by sensory assessment of block level.ResultsAll surgeries were successfully concluded with minimal haemodynamic variation and avoidance of mechanical invasive ventilation. Patients were admitted in the PACU, where spinal catheters were removed, and continued their recovery at the speciality yard. No complications were observed, particularly post-dural puncture headache, neurologic or infectious events.ConclusionsCSA is a useful anesthetic technique with a low failure rate. Its best role is likely to be in high-risk surgical patients, as it can provide excellent blockade conditions, with small doses of LA and little haemodynamic variation frequently seen with single shot techniques.","PeriodicalId":403463,"journal":{"name":"Central nerve blocks","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central nerve blocks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2021-esra.59","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and AimsDescribed during World War II, continuous spinal anesthesia (CSA) enables continuous administration of intrathecal drugs, offering several anesthetic options versus single shot technique, although underutilised.Here we present 4 cases of CSA performed for patients undergoing urgent upper abdominal and lower extremity orthopedic surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our patients were ranked between 90–100 years old with ASA score IV, in which we highlight the presence of ischemic heart disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.MethodsInvasive hemodynamic measurement was performed before CSA technique. Given the lack of microcatheter-over-the-needle kits in our center, we performed the technique using Perifix® Complete Set – B Braun, with full aseptic technique. The 18G Tuohy needle was introduced via a midline approach until CSF was encountered. The 20G catheter was then introduced 3cm into the subarachnoid space. In all situations we opted for the administration of sufentanil 0.0025 mg plus subsequent aliquots of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.125%, guided by sensory assessment of block level.ResultsAll surgeries were successfully concluded with minimal haemodynamic variation and avoidance of mechanical invasive ventilation. Patients were admitted in the PACU, where spinal catheters were removed, and continued their recovery at the speciality yard. No complications were observed, particularly post-dural puncture headache, neurologic or infectious events.ConclusionsCSA is a useful anesthetic technique with a low failure rate. Its best role is likely to be in high-risk surgical patients, as it can provide excellent blockade conditions, with small doses of LA and little haemodynamic variation frequently seen with single shot techniques.
持续脊髓麻醉——新生儿需要时的一项技术?
背景和目的在第二次世界大战期间,连续脊髓麻醉(CSA)使鞘内药物持续给药,与单针技术相比,提供了几种麻醉选择,尽管未得到充分利用。在这里,我们报告了4例在COVID-19大流行期间接受紧急上腹部和下肢骨科手术的患者的CSA。我们的患者年龄在90-100岁之间,ASA评分为IV,其中我们突出了缺血性心脏病和慢性阻塞性肺病的存在。方法采用CSA技术前进行有创血流动力学测量。鉴于我们中心缺乏针上微导管试剂盒,我们使用perfix®Complete Set - B Braun全无菌技术进行了该技术。18G Tuohy针通过中线入路插入,直到遇到脑脊液。然后将20G导管插入蛛网膜下腔3cm。在所有情况下,我们都选择舒芬太尼0.0025 mg加随后的等分高压布比卡因0.125%,以感觉评估阻滞水平为指导。结果所有手术均成功完成,血流动力学变化最小,避免了机械有创通气。患者入住PACU,在那里取出脊髓导管,并在专业院子继续康复。没有观察到并发症,特别是硬脑膜穿刺后头痛,神经系统或感染事件。结论scsa是一种有效的麻醉技术,失败率低。它的最佳作用可能是在高风险的外科患者中,因为它可以提供良好的阻断条件,小剂量的LA和很少的血流动力学变化是单次注射技术常见的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信