On Cohen’s Critique of Technology and Social Justice

Li Yong, Zhang Yi
{"title":"On Cohen’s Critique of Technology and Social Justice","authors":"Li Yong, Zhang Yi","doi":"10.11648/J.ASH.20190502.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is supposed that to be just in society is the intrinsic pursuit of Marxist theory in Marx’s original text. While as the result of historical context, according to Marx, the just society can be realized in a far future. Cohen holds materialism standpoint to illustrate historical materialism creatively by functional explanation in the modern history context. In a new time with much more advanced science and technology, he is keeping going with the route of Marxism for overcoming the technique alienation and argues that in order to realize freedom, equality and justice, appealing to empirical critique of technology and exploration of social theory is essential. The demonstration of that freedom, equality and justice are compatible, which is a cornerstone of practical just social theory. As Cohen is in the analytical tradition, his creative functional explanation presents obvious empiricism and analytical character. He digs out the key of resolving problem of development in moral dimension apart from the materialism, and conducts the argument to attack the political designs, which separates free distribution in market, quality in society, and just spirit from each other. This essay is intended to figure out Cohen’s argument that is based on the traditional Marxism and stand, while points out a new way to help people reach the just society at the much more near future.","PeriodicalId":300225,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Sciences and Humanities","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Sciences and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.ASH.20190502.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is supposed that to be just in society is the intrinsic pursuit of Marxist theory in Marx’s original text. While as the result of historical context, according to Marx, the just society can be realized in a far future. Cohen holds materialism standpoint to illustrate historical materialism creatively by functional explanation in the modern history context. In a new time with much more advanced science and technology, he is keeping going with the route of Marxism for overcoming the technique alienation and argues that in order to realize freedom, equality and justice, appealing to empirical critique of technology and exploration of social theory is essential. The demonstration of that freedom, equality and justice are compatible, which is a cornerstone of practical just social theory. As Cohen is in the analytical tradition, his creative functional explanation presents obvious empiricism and analytical character. He digs out the key of resolving problem of development in moral dimension apart from the materialism, and conducts the argument to attack the political designs, which separates free distribution in market, quality in society, and just spirit from each other. This essay is intended to figure out Cohen’s argument that is based on the traditional Marxism and stand, while points out a new way to help people reach the just society at the much more near future.
论科恩对技术与社会正义的批判
马克思原文认为社会公正是马克思主义理论的内在追求。而由于历史语境的影响,马克思认为公正的社会是在遥远的将来才能实现的。柯亨持唯物主义立场,以现代历史语境下的功能解释创造性地阐释了历史唯物主义。在科学技术更加发达的新时代,他坚持马克思主义克服技术异化的路线,认为要实现自由、平等和正义,就必须诉诸对技术的经验性批判和对社会理论的探索。自由、平等、正义三者相容的论证,是实践正义社会理论的基石。由于科恩属于分析传统,他的创造性功能解释呈现出明显的经验性和分析性。他在唯物主义之外挖掘出解决发展问题的道德维度的关键,并对市场上的自由分配、社会上的质量、正义精神三者相分离的政治设计进行了批判。这篇文章旨在找出科恩的论点是基于传统的马克思主义和立场,同时指出了一个新的途径,帮助人们在更近的将来达到公正的社会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信