Rosalinda Arriaga Navarrete, J. Olivares, Miriam Magnolia Sosa Castro
{"title":"Análisis de estrategias de inversión de diversificación internacional: portafolios tradicionales vs ETFs","authors":"Rosalinda Arriaga Navarrete, J. Olivares, Miriam Magnolia Sosa Castro","doi":"10.24275/UAM/AZC/DCSH/AE/2019V34N87/ARRIAGA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"El presente trabajo tiene por objetivo analizar y comparar estrategias de diversificacion internacional, empleando activos tradicionales (acciones) y exchange traded fund (ETFs) de cuatro diferentes paises: Alemania, Reino Unido, Estados Unidos y Mexico; el periodo de estudio es de enero de 2012 a abril del ano 2018. La hipotesis es que, la estrategia de inversion que incluye ETFs es mas redituable, tanto por la naturaleza de dichos instrumentos, como por las comisiones que se generan a traves de la estrategia tradicional, en la cual se emplea un numero mayor de activos, con el objeto de diversificar el riesgo de cada mercado local. La metodologia implementada consiste en el modelo de Markowitz, para la obtencion de la frontera eficiente, ademas de la estimacion del Valor en Riesgo (VaR) de cada portafolio (tradicional vs ETF). Clasificacion JEL: G10, G11 Abstract The objective of this paper is to analyze and compare international diversification strategies, using traditional assets (stocks) and exchange traded fund (ETFs) from four different countries: Germany, the United Kingdom, the United States and Mexico; the study period is from January 2012 to April 2018. The hypothesis is that the investment strategy that includes ETFs is more profitable, both because of the nature of these instruments and because of the commissions that are generated through the traditional strategy, in which a greater number of assets is used, in order to diversify the risk of each local market. The methodology implemented consists of the Markowitz model, to obtain the efficient frontier, in addition to the estimation of the Value at Risk (VaR) of each portfolio (traditional vs. ETF). JEL Classification: G10, G11.","PeriodicalId":127265,"journal":{"name":"Análisis Económico","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Análisis Económico","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24275/UAM/AZC/DCSH/AE/2019V34N87/ARRIAGA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
El presente trabajo tiene por objetivo analizar y comparar estrategias de diversificacion internacional, empleando activos tradicionales (acciones) y exchange traded fund (ETFs) de cuatro diferentes paises: Alemania, Reino Unido, Estados Unidos y Mexico; el periodo de estudio es de enero de 2012 a abril del ano 2018. La hipotesis es que, la estrategia de inversion que incluye ETFs es mas redituable, tanto por la naturaleza de dichos instrumentos, como por las comisiones que se generan a traves de la estrategia tradicional, en la cual se emplea un numero mayor de activos, con el objeto de diversificar el riesgo de cada mercado local. La metodologia implementada consiste en el modelo de Markowitz, para la obtencion de la frontera eficiente, ademas de la estimacion del Valor en Riesgo (VaR) de cada portafolio (tradicional vs ETF). Clasificacion JEL: G10, G11 Abstract The objective of this paper is to analyze and compare international diversification strategies, using traditional assets (stocks) and exchange traded fund (ETFs) from four different countries: Germany, the United Kingdom, the United States and Mexico; the study period is from January 2012 to April 2018. The hypothesis is that the investment strategy that includes ETFs is more profitable, both because of the nature of these instruments and because of the commissions that are generated through the traditional strategy, in which a greater number of assets is used, in order to diversify the risk of each local market. The methodology implemented consists of the Markowitz model, to obtain the efficient frontier, in addition to the estimation of the Value at Risk (VaR) of each portfolio (traditional vs. ETF). JEL Classification: G10, G11.
本研究旨在分析和比较四个不同国家的传统资产(股票)和交易所交易基金(etf)的国际多元化策略:德国、英国、美国和墨西哥;学习时间为2012年1月至2018年4月。hipotesis是,inversion战略包括ETFs是最大有裨益,不论这些文书的性质,以及各委员会的传统战略成败得失,即采用虚拟资产,以多样化的各个地方市场的风险。该方法包括马科维茨模型,以获得有效边界,以及每个投资组合(传统vs ETF)的风险价值(VaR)估计。本文的目的是分析和比较来自四个不同国家的国际多元化战略,使用传统资产(股票)和交易所交易基金(etf):德国、英国、美国和墨西哥;研究时间为2012年1月至2018年4月。The hypothesis is that The investment战略,包括ETFs is more profitable, both of The nature of这些文书和是因为委员会that are generated through The greater传统战略,in which a number of assets is, in order to以可使用的是The risk of每一个当地市场。所采用的方法包括马科维茨模型,以获得有效的边界,以及对每个投资组合(传统与ETF)的风险价值(VaR)的估计。JEL分类:G10、G11。