Cybersquatting: A Case of First Come/First Served or Piracy on the Cyber-Seas?

M. Whitman, A. Townsend, Robert J. Aalberts
{"title":"Cybersquatting: A Case of First Come/First Served or Piracy on the Cyber-Seas?","authors":"M. Whitman, A. Townsend, Robert J. Aalberts","doi":"10.1201/1086/43304.8.1.19990301/31047.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the realm of domain name services, close doesn't count. As electronic commerce grows in importance, an increasing number of established companies scramble to create an Internet presence. However, although most companies have carefully registered their company names, name brands, and trademarks, many have been surprised to find a “cybersquatter” already owns the URL (uniform resource locator) that customers would naturally associate with the firm. Probably the most outrageous example of the problem is demonstrated by the now-famous www.whitehouse.com incident. While savvy Web users know that “.gov” is the domain for government Web sites, hundreds of thousands of users have been surprised to find a pornographic Web site where they expected information on the presidency, especially those using the reference from a very popular introductory information systems textbook. Oddly enough, the owners of whitehouse.com are not cybersquatters in the absolute sense, but are only pranksters with an odd sens...","PeriodicalId":207082,"journal":{"name":"Inf. Secur. J. A Glob. Perspect.","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inf. Secur. J. A Glob. Perspect.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1201/1086/43304.8.1.19990301/31047.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract In the realm of domain name services, close doesn't count. As electronic commerce grows in importance, an increasing number of established companies scramble to create an Internet presence. However, although most companies have carefully registered their company names, name brands, and trademarks, many have been surprised to find a “cybersquatter” already owns the URL (uniform resource locator) that customers would naturally associate with the firm. Probably the most outrageous example of the problem is demonstrated by the now-famous www.whitehouse.com incident. While savvy Web users know that “.gov” is the domain for government Web sites, hundreds of thousands of users have been surprised to find a pornographic Web site where they expected information on the presidency, especially those using the reference from a very popular introductory information systems textbook. Oddly enough, the owners of whitehouse.com are not cybersquatters in the absolute sense, but are only pranksters with an odd sens...
域名抢注:先到先得还是网络海洋盗版?
在域名服务领域,接近不算数。随着电子商务的重要性日益增加,越来越多的老牌公司争相在互联网上开展业务。然而,尽管大多数公司都仔细地注册了公司名称、品牌和商标,但许多公司惊讶地发现,一个“域名抢注者”已经拥有了客户自然会与该公司联系在一起的URL(统一资源定位符)。也许这个问题最离谱的例子是现在著名的www.whitehouse.com事件。虽然精明的网络用户知道“。gov”是政府网站的域名,但成千上万的用户却惊讶地发现一个色情网站,在那里他们期望获得有关总统的信息,特别是那些使用非常流行的介绍性信息系统教科书中的参考资料的人。奇怪的是,whitehouse.com的所有者并不是绝对意义上的域名抢注者,而只是一些有奇怪感觉的恶作剧者……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信