Beyond Student Right-to-Know Data: Factors That Can Explain Community College Graduation Rates. CCRC Brief Number 29.

Thomas R. Bailey, Juan Carlos Calcagno, Davis Jenkins, Timothy Leinbach, Gregory S. Kienzl
{"title":"Beyond Student Right-to-Know Data: Factors That Can Explain Community College Graduation Rates. CCRC Brief Number 29.","authors":"Thomas R. Bailey, Juan Carlos Calcagno, Davis Jenkins, Timothy Leinbach, Gregory S. Kienzl","doi":"10.7916/D8CN7C7B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Policymakers, educators, and researchers recognize the importance of community colleges as open door institutions that provide a wide range of students with access to college. At the same time, competing demands for the state funds that would support community colleges have resulted in reduced public allocations and higher student tuition fees. Understandably, therefore, both state policymakers and parents are increasingly focused on the returns to their public or private investments in education, and the outcomes of community college attendance are now under greater scrutiny. To facilitate the evaluation of the colleges, there are now available data, through the Student Right-to-Know and Campus Security Act (1990), which amended the Higher Education Act, on every college’s graduation rate for fall semester cohorts of first-time, fulltime (FTFT) students in degree programs. This information is known as the Student Right-to-Know (SRK) data. A related public concern is how the outcomes of community college students can be improved. Therefore, attempts are now being made to clarify the way that specific students define success and to identify the college policies and practices that can promote success for all students. For some community college students, college completion, defined as earning a degree or certificate, is the appropriate measure of success. For other students, success is demonstrated by transferring to a baccalaureate institution. Still others are satisfied with completing courses that increase their knowledge or skill level in a particular area even though their educational experience is not considered successful as defined by traditional educational outcomes. Because of this range of outcomes for their students, some community colleges argue that focusing on the completion rate of a college is misleading, because many students do not have graduation as an objective. Further, many students face insurmountable barriers to success in college, such as family and work responsibilities and deficient academic preparation, which are beyond the control of the college. Nevertheless, data on goals and expectations do indicate that community college students are ambitious and that a majority of students who state that they want to complete a degree fail to do so (Bailey, Jenkins, & Leinbach, 2005). Moreover, high aspirations make economic sense since earning only a few credits without completing a certificate or degree has few income returns (Bailey, Kienzl, & Marcotte, 2004). Given the importance of completions, this Brief reports on research conducted by the Community College Research Center designed to strengthen the public’s ability to assess and compare community college performance by measuring the effect of certain institutional characteristics on graduation rates. The research consisted of the development of models, based on SRK graduation rate data, which can identify the institutional characteristics that might influence those rates and then measure the effect of those characteristics on the rates. The ultimate goal of the research is to help community college’s improve the educational outcomes of their students.","PeriodicalId":218750,"journal":{"name":"Community College Research Center, Columbia University","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community College Research Center, Columbia University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7916/D8CN7C7B","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Policymakers, educators, and researchers recognize the importance of community colleges as open door institutions that provide a wide range of students with access to college. At the same time, competing demands for the state funds that would support community colleges have resulted in reduced public allocations and higher student tuition fees. Understandably, therefore, both state policymakers and parents are increasingly focused on the returns to their public or private investments in education, and the outcomes of community college attendance are now under greater scrutiny. To facilitate the evaluation of the colleges, there are now available data, through the Student Right-to-Know and Campus Security Act (1990), which amended the Higher Education Act, on every college’s graduation rate for fall semester cohorts of first-time, fulltime (FTFT) students in degree programs. This information is known as the Student Right-to-Know (SRK) data. A related public concern is how the outcomes of community college students can be improved. Therefore, attempts are now being made to clarify the way that specific students define success and to identify the college policies and practices that can promote success for all students. For some community college students, college completion, defined as earning a degree or certificate, is the appropriate measure of success. For other students, success is demonstrated by transferring to a baccalaureate institution. Still others are satisfied with completing courses that increase their knowledge or skill level in a particular area even though their educational experience is not considered successful as defined by traditional educational outcomes. Because of this range of outcomes for their students, some community colleges argue that focusing on the completion rate of a college is misleading, because many students do not have graduation as an objective. Further, many students face insurmountable barriers to success in college, such as family and work responsibilities and deficient academic preparation, which are beyond the control of the college. Nevertheless, data on goals and expectations do indicate that community college students are ambitious and that a majority of students who state that they want to complete a degree fail to do so (Bailey, Jenkins, & Leinbach, 2005). Moreover, high aspirations make economic sense since earning only a few credits without completing a certificate or degree has few income returns (Bailey, Kienzl, & Marcotte, 2004). Given the importance of completions, this Brief reports on research conducted by the Community College Research Center designed to strengthen the public’s ability to assess and compare community college performance by measuring the effect of certain institutional characteristics on graduation rates. The research consisted of the development of models, based on SRK graduation rate data, which can identify the institutional characteristics that might influence those rates and then measure the effect of those characteristics on the rates. The ultimate goal of the research is to help community college’s improve the educational outcomes of their students.
超越学生知情权的数据:可以解释社区大学毕业率的因素。CCRC简报第29号。
政策制定者、教育工作者和研究人员都认识到社区大学作为开放机构的重要性,它为各种各样的学生提供了进入大学的机会。与此同时,对支持社区大学的国家资金的竞争导致了公共拨款的减少和学生学费的提高。因此,可以理解的是,州政府决策者和家长都越来越关注他们在教育方面的公共或私人投资的回报,社区大学入学率的结果现在受到更严格的审查。为了便于对大学进行评估,通过修订了《高等教育法》的《学生知情权和校园安全法》(1990年),现在有了每所大学秋季学期全日制学位课程学生的毕业率数据。这些信息被称为学生知情权(SRK)数据。一个相关的公众关注是如何提高社区大学生的成绩。因此,现在正在尝试澄清特定学生定义成功的方式,并确定可以促进所有学生成功的大学政策和实践。对于一些社区大学的学生来说,完成大学学业,即获得学位或证书,是衡量成功的适当标准。对于其他学生来说,成功是通过转到学士学位机构来证明的。还有一些人对完成课程感到满意,这些课程增加了他们在某一特定领域的知识或技能水平,即使他们的教育经历按照传统教育成果的定义并不被认为是成功的。由于学生的成绩范围如此之大,一些社区大学认为,关注大学的完成率是一种误导,因为许多学生并不把毕业作为目标。此外,许多学生在大学里面临着难以逾越的障碍,比如家庭和工作责任,以及缺乏学术准备,这些都超出了学校的控制范围。然而,关于目标和期望的数据确实表明,社区大学的学生雄心勃勃,而且大多数声称想要完成学位的学生都没有做到(Bailey, Jenkins, & Leinbach, 2005)。此外,高抱负在经济上是有意义的,因为在没有完成证书或学位的情况下只获得几个学分几乎没有收入回报(Bailey, Kienzl, & Marcotte, 2004)。鉴于毕业率的重要性,本文简要报告了社区大学研究中心进行的一项研究,该研究旨在通过衡量某些制度特征对毕业率的影响,加强公众评估和比较社区大学表现的能力。该研究包括基于SRK毕业率数据的模型开发,该模型可以识别可能影响毕业率的制度特征,然后测量这些特征对毕业率的影响。本研究的最终目的是帮助社区学院提高学生的教育成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信