Benefits and Drawbacks of Using Social Media to Grieve Following the Loss of Pet

Jessica Vitak, P. Wisniewski, Zahra Ashktorab, Karla A. Badillo-Urquiola
{"title":"Benefits and Drawbacks of Using Social Media to Grieve Following the Loss of Pet","authors":"Jessica Vitak, P. Wisniewski, Zahra Ashktorab, Karla A. Badillo-Urquiola","doi":"10.1145/3097286.3097309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As social media becomes more deeply embedded into our daily lives, researchers are examining how previously private disclosures and interactions are manifesting in semi-public spaces. This study evaluates how sites like Facebook may help users grieve following the loss of a family pet. Through an empirical study of Facebook users, we evaluate survey responses (N=396) and users' actual Facebook posts related to pet loss (N=190) to better understand how individuals use (or do not use) social media as part of the grieving process. We find that users weigh several benefits and drawbacks before making these sensitive disclosures on Facebook, including whether they think posting will mitigate or perpetuate their emotional pain, the privacy of the experience vs. the public nature of sharing, and whether their disclosures will be met with support or dismissal (i.e., disenfranchised grief). We conclude by discussing implications for theory around grief and social support, as well as the design of social media interfaces that support grieving processes for the loss of a loved one.","PeriodicalId":130378,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Social Media & Society","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Social Media & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3097286.3097309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

As social media becomes more deeply embedded into our daily lives, researchers are examining how previously private disclosures and interactions are manifesting in semi-public spaces. This study evaluates how sites like Facebook may help users grieve following the loss of a family pet. Through an empirical study of Facebook users, we evaluate survey responses (N=396) and users' actual Facebook posts related to pet loss (N=190) to better understand how individuals use (or do not use) social media as part of the grieving process. We find that users weigh several benefits and drawbacks before making these sensitive disclosures on Facebook, including whether they think posting will mitigate or perpetuate their emotional pain, the privacy of the experience vs. the public nature of sharing, and whether their disclosures will be met with support or dismissal (i.e., disenfranchised grief). We conclude by discussing implications for theory around grief and social support, as well as the design of social media interfaces that support grieving processes for the loss of a loved one.
失去宠物后使用社交媒体哀悼的好处和缺点
随着社交媒体越来越深入我们的日常生活,研究人员正在研究以前私人的披露和互动如何在半公共空间中表现出来。这项研究评估了像Facebook这样的网站如何帮助失去宠物的用户悲伤。通过对Facebook用户的实证研究,我们评估了调查反馈(N=396)和用户在Facebook上发布的与宠物丢失有关的实际帖子(N=190),以更好地了解个人如何使用(或不使用)社交媒体作为悲伤过程的一部分。我们发现,用户在Facebook上披露这些敏感信息之前,会权衡几个利弊,包括他们认为发帖会减轻还是延续他们的情感痛苦,经历的隐私性与分享的公共性,以及他们的披露是会得到支持还是会被拒绝(即被剥夺权利的悲伤)。最后,我们讨论了关于悲伤和社会支持的理论含义,以及支持失去亲人的悲伤过程的社交媒体界面的设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信