Gender equality, paid and unpaid care and domestic work: Disadvantages of state-supported marketization of care and domestic work

IF 0.9
Sumika Yamane
{"title":"Gender equality, paid and unpaid care and domestic work: Disadvantages of state-supported marketization of care and domestic work","authors":"Sumika Yamane","doi":"10.1080/2329194X.2021.1874826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Gender inequality, caused by the unequal distribution of unpaid care and domestic work between genders, has been a major feminist issue for a long time. This article demonstrates that so-called gender equality policies, which aim to reduce the burden of women’s unpaid care and domestic work through the state-supported marketization of these services, create a vulnerable group of under-paid care and domestic workers. Such policies widen income gap between women who can purchase these services and those who cannot. I will propose feminist initiatives for gender equality that address these problems","PeriodicalId":174725,"journal":{"name":"The Japanese Political Economy","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Japanese Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2329194X.2021.1874826","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Gender inequality, caused by the unequal distribution of unpaid care and domestic work between genders, has been a major feminist issue for a long time. This article demonstrates that so-called gender equality policies, which aim to reduce the burden of women’s unpaid care and domestic work through the state-supported marketization of these services, create a vulnerable group of under-paid care and domestic workers. Such policies widen income gap between women who can purchase these services and those who cannot. I will propose feminist initiatives for gender equality that address these problems
性别平等,有偿和无偿护理和家务劳动:国家支持的护理和家务劳动市场化的弊端
长期以来,性别不平等一直是女权主义的一个重大问题。性别不平等是由男女之间无偿照顾和家务劳动的分配不平等造成的。本文表明,所谓的性别平等政策,旨在通过国家支持的这些服务的市场化来减轻妇女无偿护理和家务劳动的负担,创造了一个弱势群体,即报酬不足的护理和家务工人。这些政策扩大了能够购买这些服务的妇女与不能购买这些服务的妇女之间的收入差距。我将提出解决这些问题的性别平等女权主义倡议
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书