Uma abordagem reducionista ao problema da identidade dos indiscerníveis

J. F. Silva
{"title":"Uma abordagem reducionista ao problema da identidade dos indiscerníveis","authors":"J. F. Silva","doi":"10.21747/978-989-9082-05-2/ofaa4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I aim to defend the thesis that the truth of any proposition about the number of particulars that exist in the world is supervenient upon the truth of all propositions exclusively about universals (i.e., properties and relations). If this thesis is correct, all facts about the individuation of particulars are reducible to facts exclusively about universals, and there is no primitive individuation of particulars. I present two arguments against the possibility of this kind of primitive individuation. The first is that the possibility of primitively individuated particulars raises radical skeptical doubts about the number of particulars with which we are acquainted. The second is that primitively individuated particulars are theoretically redundant since the qualitative character of any possible world can be exhaustively described if we talk only about universals. The classical bundle theory is the most common variety of reductionism about the number of particulars, but I also want to defend that it is not the only possible variety. More specifically, I present an alternative according to which particulars are individuated by spatial relations. This alternative, in contrast to bundle theory, does not commit us to the controversial principle of the identity of indiscernibles, but it implies a transcendent conception of universals.","PeriodicalId":115439,"journal":{"name":"Linguagem e Ontologia: questões sobre conhecimento e agência=Language and Ontology: questions on knowledge and agency","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguagem e Ontologia: questões sobre conhecimento e agência=Language and Ontology: questions on knowledge and agency","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21747/978-989-9082-05-2/ofaa4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

I aim to defend the thesis that the truth of any proposition about the number of particulars that exist in the world is supervenient upon the truth of all propositions exclusively about universals (i.e., properties and relations). If this thesis is correct, all facts about the individuation of particulars are reducible to facts exclusively about universals, and there is no primitive individuation of particulars. I present two arguments against the possibility of this kind of primitive individuation. The first is that the possibility of primitively individuated particulars raises radical skeptical doubts about the number of particulars with which we are acquainted. The second is that primitively individuated particulars are theoretically redundant since the qualitative character of any possible world can be exhaustively described if we talk only about universals. The classical bundle theory is the most common variety of reductionism about the number of particulars, but I also want to defend that it is not the only possible variety. More specifically, I present an alternative according to which particulars are individuated by spatial relations. This alternative, in contrast to bundle theory, does not commit us to the controversial principle of the identity of indiscernibles, but it implies a transcendent conception of universals.
一种简化主义的方法来解决不可分辨的同一性问题
我的目的是捍卫这个命题,即任何关于世界上存在的细节数量的命题的真理都是基于所有关于共相的命题的真理的(即,属性和关系)。如果这个论点是正确的,那么关于特殊性的个体化的一切事实都可以归结为关于共相的唯一的事实,并且没有关于特殊性的原始的个体化。我提出两个论点来反对这种原始个性化的可能性。首先,原始个体化的细节的可能性引起了对我们所熟悉的细节数量的激进的怀疑。第二,原始个体化的特殊性在理论上是多余的,因为只要我们只谈共相,任何可能世界的质的特性都可以被详尽地描述出来。经典束理论是关于细节数量的还原论最常见的变种,但我也想为它辩护,它不是唯一可能的变种。更具体地说,我提出了另一种选择,根据这种选择,细节被空间关系个性化。这一选择,与束理论相反,并没有把我们承诺到不可分辨的身份的有争议的原则,但它意味着普遍性的超越概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信